These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
29 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28586089)
1. Training specialists to write appropriate reply letters to general practitioners about patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms; A cluster-randomized trial. Weiland A; Blankenstein AH; Willems MH; Van Saase JL; Van Daele PL; Van der Molen HT; Langbroek GB; Bootsma A; Vriens EM; Oberndorff-Klein Woolthuis A; Vernhout RM; Arends LR Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Oct; 98(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 26206385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality and general practitioner satisfaction with reply letters for dementia patients. Kada S; Nygaard HA; Kada R; Laura T; Billsback U; Geitung JT Qual Prim Care; 2008; 16(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 18700097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What is a low dose? Response to "Reply to 'The RBE of low-LET radiations' " Reply to the Response to "Reply to 'The RBE of low-LET radiations' " Comment on 'Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation' Reply to "Comment on 'Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation' ". Smith GM J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):93-101; author reply 99-101. PubMed ID: 20234069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Food allergy order in 16 pairs of brothers and 4 families]. De Luca L; Chiummariello S Pediatr Med Chir; 1994; 16(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 8029090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adolescents' reply intent for sexual disclosure in cyberspace: gender differences and effects of anonymity and topic intimacy. Chiou WB Cyberpsychol Behav; 2007 Oct; 10(5):725-8. PubMed ID: 17927545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Role and place of the military physician. A reply to a reply]. den Duyn P Ned Milit Geneeskd Tijdschr; 1965 Aug; 18(8):259-62. PubMed ID: 5839322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reply to: the "Reply to Slankamenac et al's Comprehensive Complication Index Validation Study (November 2014)". Slankamenac K; Puhan MA; Clavien PA Ann Surg; 2016 Aug; 264(2):e12. PubMed ID: 26079897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Aberrations of an IR chopping secondary: authors' reply to comment 2 and continuation of authors' reply to comment 1. Meinel AB; Meinel MP Appl Opt; 1985 Apr; 24(7):944. PubMed ID: 20436652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reply to Iwata: Are all fosfomycins alike? Reply to author. Sastry S; Doi Y J Infect Chemother; 2016 Oct; 22(10):725. PubMed ID: 27578031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Further discussion of the HIP and the Stanford Form C: a reply to a reply by Frischholz, Spiegel, Tryon, and Fisher. Hilgard ER Am J Clin Hypn; 1981 Oct; 24(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 7340496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reply to Oluf Anderson's reply: Predicting a window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis. Ebers G; Daumer M; Scalfari A Brain; 2011 May; 134(Pt 5):e175; author reply e176. PubMed ID: 21303856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reply letters following orthodontic consultations: an audit of Merseyside general dental practitioners' satisfaction. Waring DT; Harrison JE Prim Dent Care; 2007 Apr; 14(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 17462137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Great stir about an antifluoridationist letter; reply from Dr. Gordon Nikiforuk; reply from the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Ottiwell CD; Nikiforuk G J Dent Que; 1968 Jan; 5(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 5240209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. More on the looser comparative approach to defining "health": a reply to Nordenfelt's reply. Brülde B Med Health Care Philos; 2000; 3(3):313-5. PubMed ID: 11200033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reply to the reply to "comment on the invited editorial 'effectiveness of tritium beta particles'". Muller WU J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):424-5; author reply 425-6. PubMed ID: 18841595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A reply to D. Wildemeersch's erring reply. Three-year efficacy and acceptability of the GyneFix 200 intrauterine system. Sivin I Contraception; 2005 Apr; 71(4):315. PubMed ID: 15792655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]