238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28587597)
1. "On the same page"? The effect of GP examiner feedback on differences in rating severity in clinical assessments: a pre/post intervention study.
Sturman N; Ostini R; Wong WY; Zhang J; David M
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Jun; 17(1):101. PubMed ID: 28587597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploration of a possible relationship between examiner stringency and personality factors in clinical assessments: a pilot study.
Finn Y; Cantillon P; Flaherty G
BMC Med Educ; 2014 Dec; 14():1052. PubMed ID: 25551778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling.
McManus IC; Thompson M; Mollon J
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():42. PubMed ID: 16919156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs.
Yeates P; Cope N; Hawarden A; Bradshaw H; McCray G; Homer M
Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 53(3):250-263. PubMed ID: 30575092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE.
Moineau G; Power B; Pion AM; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
Med Educ; 2011 Feb; 45(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 21166691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer feedback for examiner quality assurance on MRCGP International South Asia: a mixed methods study.
Perera DP; Andrades M; Wass V
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Dec; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 29221450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRCGP CSA: are the examiners biased, favouring their own by sex, ethnicity, and degree source?
Denney ML; Freeman A; Wakeford R
Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Nov; 63(616):e718-25. PubMed ID: 24267854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examiner training: A study of examiners making sense of norm-referenced feedback.
Crossley JGM; Groves J; Croke D; Brennan PA
Med Teach; 2019 Jul; 41(7):787-794. PubMed ID: 30912989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Examiner fatigue in communication skills objective structured clinical examinations.
Humphris GM; Kaney S
Med Educ; 2001 May; 35(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 11328514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs.
Harasym PH; Woloschuk W; Cunning L
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):617-32. PubMed ID: 17610034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?
Faherty A; Counihan T; Kropmans T; Finn Y
BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 32393228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experiences of using an OSCE protocol in clinical examinations of nursing students - A comparison of student and faculty assessments.
Lyngå P; Masiello I; Karlgren K; Joelsson-Alm E
Nurse Educ Pract; 2019 Feb; 35():130-134. PubMed ID: 30802783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools.
Chesser A; Cameron H; Evans P; Cleland J; Boursicot K; Mires G
Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 19493176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring examiner judgement of professional competence in rater based assessment.
Naumann FL; Marshall S; Shulruf B; Jones PD
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Oct; 21(4):775-88. PubMed ID: 26796200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating possible ethnicity and sex bias in clinical examiners: an analysis of data from the MRCP(UK) PACES and nPACES examinations.
McManus IC; Elder AT; Dacre J
BMC Med Educ; 2013 Jul; 13():103. PubMed ID: 23899223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feedback Credibility in a Formative Postgraduate Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Effects of Examiner Type.
Stroud L; Sibbald M; Richardson D; McDonald-Blumer H; Cavalcanti RB
J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Apr; 10(2):185-191. PubMed ID: 29686758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations.
Chong L; Taylor S; Haywood M; Adelstein BA; Shulruf B
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():34. PubMed ID: 29278906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile.
Junod Perron N; Louis-Simonet M; Cerutti B; Pfarrwaller E; Sommer J; Nendaz M
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):293. PubMed ID: 27846882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using cultural historical activity theory to reflect on the sociocultural complexities in OSCE examiners' judgements.
Wong WYA; Thistlethwaite J; Moni K; Roberts C
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Mar; 28(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 35943605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do clinical clerks provide candidates with adequate formative assessment during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations?
Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Nandagopal K; Eva KW
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 15316270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
