These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28590097)

  • 1. Five Year Clinical Evaluation of Restorations Placed in a Low Shrinkage Stress Composite in UK General Dental Practices.
    Burke FJT; Crisp RJ; James A; Mackenzie L; Thompson O; Pal A; Sands P; Palin WM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2017 Jun; 25(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 28590097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two year clinical evaluation of a low-shrink resin composite material in UK general dental practices.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; James A; Mackenzie L; Pal A; Sands P; Thompson O; Palin WM
    Dent Mater; 2011 Jul; 27(7):622-30. PubMed ID: 21514654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
    Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
    Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Giráldez I; Ceballos L
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year clinical performance of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations.
    Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Ceballos L
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 23570300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A double-blind randomized clinical trial of a silorane-based resin composite in class 2 restorations: 18-month follow-up.
    Gonçalves FS; Leal CD; Bueno AC; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Magalhães CS
    Am J Dent; 2013 Apr; 26(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 24073532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study.
    El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
    Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practice-based, clinical trial of a silorane-based composite resin system in posterior teeth.
    Malhotra N; Somashekar ST; Mala K; Pai V; Shenoy R
    SADJ; 2013 Sep; 68(8):358, 360-3. PubMed ID: 24660403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low-shrinkage composites: an in vitro evaluation of sealing ability after occlusal loading.
    Barceleiro MO; Soares GM; Espindola O; Kahn S; Pola Poiate IA; Sampaio Filho HR
    Gen Dent; 2015; 63(3):e36-40. PubMed ID: 25945777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface?
    Van Ende A; De Munck J; Mine A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 19906417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Bell TJ; Healy A; Mark B; McBirnie R; Osborne-Smith KL
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 12066649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based composite: 1-year randomized clinical trial.
    Schmidt M; Kirkevang LL; Hørsted-Bindslev P; Poulsen S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Apr; 15(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 20644971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five-year evaluation of a low-shrinkage Silorane resin composite material: a randomized clinical trial.
    Schmidt M; Dige I; Kirkevang LL; Vaeth M; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Mar; 19(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 24687249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.