165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28591756)
1. The "Fetal Reserve Index": Re-Engineering the Interpretation and Responses to Fetal Heart Rate Patterns.
Eden RD; Evans MI; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2018; 43(2):90-104. PubMed ID: 28591756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-engineering the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring to identify reversible risk for cerebral palsy: a case control series.
Evans MI; Eden RD; Britt DW; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(15):2561-2569. PubMed ID: 29447043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safely lowering the emergency Cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates using the Fetal Reserve Index.
Eden RD; Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 May; 33(9):1473-1479. PubMed ID: 30269624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined prenatal and postnatal prediction of early neonatal compromise risk.
Eden RD; Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Gallagher P; Schifrin BS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(18):2996-3007. PubMed ID: 31581872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Fetal Reserve Index Significantly Outperforms ACOG Category System in Predicting Cord Blood Base Excess and pH: A Methodological Failure of the Category System.
Evans MI; Britt DW; Eden RD; Gallagher P; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
Reprod Sci; 2019 Jun; 26(6):858-863. PubMed ID: 30832536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reengineering Electronic Fetal Monitoring Interpretation: Using the Fetal Reserve Index to Anticipate the Need for Emergent Operative Delivery.
Eden RD; Evans MI; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
Reprod Sci; 2018 Apr; 25(4):487-497. PubMed ID: 29137550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Refining the Prediction and Prevention of Emergency Operative Deliveries with the Fetal Reserve Index.
Britt DW; Evans MI; Schifrin BS; Eden RD
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2019; 46(3):159-165. PubMed ID: 30463080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring: the fetal reserve index.
Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Devoe LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5S):S1129-S1143. PubMed ID: 37164491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changing Perspectives of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.
Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Devoe LD
Reprod Sci; 2022 Jun; 29(6):1874-1894. PubMed ID: 34664218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Earlier and improved screening for impending fetal compromise.
Evans MI; Britt DW; Eden RD; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(15):2895-2903. PubMed ID: 32873102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Timing intrapartum management based on the evolution and duration of fetal heart rate patterns.
Vintzileos AM; Smulian JC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7936-7941. PubMed ID: 34121585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Value of the Cerebroplacental Ratio for the Prediction of Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring in Low-Risk Term Pregnancies.
Liu J; Song G; Zhao G; Meng T
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(5):475-480. PubMed ID: 27794572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response to category II tracings: Does anything help?
Raghuraman N
Semin Perinatol; 2020 Mar; 44(2):151217. PubMed ID: 32007313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal and quantitative associations of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring patterns and neonatal outcomes
Ogunyemi D; Jovanovski A; Friedman P; Sweatman B; Madan I
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Sep; 32(18):3115-3124. PubMed ID: 29621921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy.
Nelson KB; Dambrosia JM; Ting TY; Grether JK
N Engl J Med; 1996 Mar; 334(10):613-8. PubMed ID: 8592523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal.
Maso G; Piccoli M; De Seta F; Parolin S; Banco R; Camacho Mattos L; Bogatti P; Alberico S
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Feb; 67(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 25411863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Update on Fetal Monitoring: Overview of Approaches and Management of Category II Tracings.
Raghuraman N; Cahill AG
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2017 Dec; 44(4):615-624. PubMed ID: 29078943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring.
Porter AC; Triebwasser JE; Tuuli M; Caughey AB; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(8):786-90. PubMed ID: 26906183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
