These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28591756)
21. The role of perinatal and intrapartum risk factors in the etiology of cerebral palsy in term deliveries in a Turkish population. Gurbuz A; Karateke A; Yilmaz U; Kabaca C J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 16690507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey. Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of dialysis on fetal heart rate: is inpatient admission for fetal monitoring necessary? Loichinger MH; Broady AJ; Yamasato K; Mills E; McLemore PG; Towner D J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jun; 30(11):1293-1296. PubMed ID: 27405251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the interpretation of intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Balayla J; Shrem G Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jul; 300(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 31053949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. Pinas A; Chandraharan E Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prevention of cerebral palsy during labour: role of foetal lactate. Borruto F; Comparetto C; Treisser A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 278(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18071726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems. Gyamfi Bannerman C; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Blackwell S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):288.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22071068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The future of electronic fetal monitoring. Knupp RJ; Andrews WW; Tita ATN Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Aug; 67():44-52. PubMed ID: 32299728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Concordance analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography between physicians and artificial intelligence-based technique using modified one-dimensional fully convolutional networks. Liu LC; Tsai YH; Chou YC; Jheng YC; Lin CK; Lyu NY; Chien Y; Yang YP; Chang KJ; Chang KH; Lee YL; Wang PH; Chu TW; Chang CC J Chin Med Assoc; 2021 Feb; 84(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 32858548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Graded classification of fetal heart rate tracings: association with neonatal metabolic acidosis and neurologic morbidity. Elliott C; Warrick PA; Graham E; Hamilton EF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 202(3):258.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19716539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: evaluation of a standardized system of interpretation for prediction of metabolic acidosis at delivery and neonatal neurological morbidity. Soncini E; Paganelli S; Vezzani C; Gargano G; Giovanni Battista LS J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Sep; 27(14):1465-9. PubMed ID: 24156253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fetal heart rate monitoring category 3 during the 2nd stage of labor is an independent predictor of fetal acidosis. Silberstein T; Sheiner E; Salem SY; Hamou B; Aricha B; Baumfeld Y; Yohay Z; Elharar D; Idan I; Yohay D J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Feb; 30(3):257-260. PubMed ID: 27023800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fetal heart rate patterns related to neonatal brain damage and neonatal death in placental abruption. Takano Y; Furukawa S; Ohashi M; Michikata K; Sameshima H; Ikenoue T J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 22845749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The clinical interpretation and significance of electronic fetal heart rate patterns 2 h before delivery: an institutional observational study. Maso G; Businelli C; Piccoli M; Montico M; De Seta F; Sartore A; Alberico S Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 22791414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future. Stout MJ; Cahill AG Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Solving the Obstetrical Paradox: The FETAL Technique-A Step toward Noninvasive Evaluation of Fetal pH. Balayla J; Shrem G J Pregnancy; 2020; 2020():7801039. PubMed ID: 32089884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]