These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28591940)

  • 1. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps.
    Tran BNN; Fadayomi A; Lin SJ; Singhal D; Lee BT
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):439-447. PubMed ID: 28591940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.
    de Blacam C; Momoh AO; Colakoglu S; Slavin SA; Tobias AM; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Nov; 69(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 21587037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction.
    Krishnan NM; Chatterjee A; Rosenkranz KM; Powell SG; Nigriny JF; Vidal DC
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24508194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: a comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps.
    Damen TH; Wei W; Mureau MA; Tjong-Joe-Wai R; Hofer SO; Essink-Bot ML; Hovius SE; Polinder S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Aug; 64(8):1043-53. PubMed ID: 21317054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical outcomes and cost of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap versus implants for breast reconstruction.
    Khajuria A; Smith OJ; Prokopenko M; Greenfield M; Mosahebi A
    Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):232. PubMed ID: 29166926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.
    Bank J; Phillips NA; Park JE; Song DH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(6):1194-201. PubMed ID: 24091489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of acellular dermal matrix to autologous dermal flaps in single-stage, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Krishnan NM; Chatterjee A; Van Vliet MM; Powell SG; Rosen JM; Nigriny JF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):953-961. PubMed ID: 23629077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dermal Autograft Using Donor Breast as Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Review.
    North WD; Kubajak CS; St Martin B; Rinker B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 78(6S Suppl 5):S282-S285. PubMed ID: 28296716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Salvage of the failed implant-based breast reconstruction using the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: A single centre experience with tertiary breast reconstruction.
    Holmes WJM; Quinn M; Emam AT; Ali SR; Prousskaia E; Wilson SM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jul; 72(7):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30930124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of resource utilisation of single stage porcine acellular dermal matrix assisted breast reconstruction: A comparative study.
    Kilchenmann AJ; Lardi AM; Ho-Asjoe M; Junge K; Farhadi J
    Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 25311295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal based perforator free flaps.
    Tran BNN; Fadayomi A; Lin SJ; Singhal D; Lee BT; Lee BT; Nahabedian MY
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):448-449. PubMed ID: 28591935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of long-term cost and clinical outcomes between the two-stage sequence expander/prosthesis and autologous deep inferior epigastric flap methods for breast reconstruction in a public hospital.
    Lagares-Borrego A; Gacto-Sanchez P; Infante-Cossio P; Barrera-Pulido F; Sicilia-Castro D; Gomez-Cia T
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 26794627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix Increase Postoperative Complications of the First-Stage Reconstruction of Immediate Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Woo KJ; Park JW; Mun GH; Pyon JK; Jeon BJ; Bang SI
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 79(4):341-345. PubMed ID: 28509694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q.
    Matros E; Albornoz CR; Razdan SN; Mehrara BJ; Macadam SA; Ro T; McCarthy CM; Disa JJ; Cordeiro PG; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):937-946. PubMed ID: 25517411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Unilateral Implant or Autologous Breast Reconstruction Better in Obtaining Breast Symmetry?
    Cohen O; Small K; Lee C; Petruolo O; Karp N; Choi M
    Breast J; 2016; 22(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 26534828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolving Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Is the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Taking Over?
    Pien I; Caccavale S; Cheung MC; Butala P; Hughes DB; Ligh C; Zenn MR; Hollenbeck ST
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25180959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cost effectiveness of the DIEP flap relative to the muscle-sparing TRAM flap in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Krishnan NM; Purnell C; Nahabedian MY; Freed GL; Nigriny JF; Rosen JM; Rosson GD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):948-958. PubMed ID: 25811560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Thoma A; Veltri K; Khuthaila D; Rockwell G; Duku E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 May; 113(6):1650-61. PubMed ID: 15114125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
    Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Zhong T; Temple-Oberle C; Hofer SO; Beber B; Semple J; Brown M; Macadam S; Lennox P; Panzarella T; McCarthy C; Baxter N;
    Trials; 2013 Oct; 14():356. PubMed ID: 24165392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.