These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28594222)

  • 1. Can credibility criteria be assessed reliably? A meta-analysis of criteria-based content analysis.
    Hauch V; Sporer SL; Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):819-834. PubMed ID: 28594222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A call to improve the validity of criterion-based content analysis (CBCA): Results from a field-based study including 60 children's statements of sexual abuse.
    Welle I; Berclaz M; Lacasa MJ; Niveau G
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Oct; 43():111-119. PubMed ID: 27570234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting deception in children: event familiarity affects criterion-based content analysis ratings.
    Pezdek K; Morrow A; Blandon-Gitlin I; Goodman GS; Quas JA; Saywitz KJ; Bidrose S; Pipe ME; Rogers M; Brodie L
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 14769124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis": Correction to Oberlader et al. (2016).
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Apr; 43(2):165. PubMed ID: 30883181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater Reliability of Criteria-Based Content Analysis of Children's Statements of Abuse.
    Niveau G; Lacasa MJ; Berclaz M; Germond M
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1247-52. PubMed ID: 26272453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis.
    Oberlader VA; Naefgen C; Koppehele-Gossel J; Quinten L; Banse R; Schmidt AF
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Aug; 40(4):440-457. PubMed ID: 27149290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review.
    Amado BG; Arce R; Fariña F; Vilariño M
    Int J Clin Health Psychol; 2016; 16(2):201-210. PubMed ID: 30487863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting deception in children: an experimental study of the effect of event familiarity on CBCA ratings.
    Blandon-Gitlin I; Pezdek K; Rogers M; Brodie L
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 15912723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of criteria-based content analysis (CBCA) at trial in free-narrative interviews.
    Roma P; Martini PS; Sabatello U; Tatarelli R; Ferracuti S
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 Aug; 35(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 21880367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Will the truth come out? the effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores.
    Vrij A; Akehurst L; Soukara S; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Jun; 26(3):261-83. PubMed ID: 12061619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proposing immersive virtual reality scenarios for validating verbal content analysis methods in adult samples.
    Iffland JA; Volz T; Gubi-Kelm S
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1352091. PubMed ID: 38440246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Strategic Meaning of CBCA Criteria From the Perspective of Deceivers.
    Maier BG; Niehaus S; Wachholz S; Volbert R
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():855. PubMed ID: 29937741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving credibility assessment in child sexual abuse allegations: the role of the NICHD investigative interview protocol.
    Hershkowitz I; Fisher S; Lamb ME; Horowitz D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2007 Feb; 31(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 17316794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taking forensic mental health assessment "out of the lab" and into "the real world": Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures.
    Edens JF; Boccaccini MT
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):599-610. PubMed ID: 28594204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interrater reliability of Violence Risk Appraisal Guide scores provided in Canadian criminal proceedings.
    Edens JF; Penson BN; Ruchensky JR; Cox J; Smith ST
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1543-1549. PubMed ID: 27046274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication: Factor structure, interrater reliability, and association with clinician opinion of competence in a forensic inpatient sample.
    Wood ME; Anderson JL; Glassmire DM
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):776-785. PubMed ID: 28594219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the level of credibility of allegations of physical torture.
    Petersen HD; Morentin B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():263-270. PubMed ID: 31185439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Information on a Motive to Lie Influences CBCA-Based Ratings and Veracity Judgments.
    Schemmel J; Steinhagen T; Ziegler M; Volbert R
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2021. PubMed ID: 32922341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future.
    Vrij A; Granhag PA; Ashkenazi T; Ganis G; Leal S; Fisher RP
    Brain Sci; 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36552104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.