These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28594238)

  • 21. EEG alpha spindles and prolonged brake reaction times during auditory distraction in an on-road driving study.
    Sonnleitner A; Treder MS; Simon M; Willmann S; Ewald A; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():110-8. PubMed ID: 24144496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of task modality and stimulus frequency in paced serial addition tests on functional brain activity.
    Gielen J; Wiels W; Van Schependom J; Laton J; Van Hecke W; Parizel PM; D'hooghe MB; Nagels G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194388. PubMed ID: 29543871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selective impairment of auditory selective attention under concurrent cognitive load.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 21928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Now hear this: Inattentional deafness depends on task relatedness.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Cohen AJ; Cooper NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2527-2546. PubMed ID: 27351552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Co-activation of the secondary somatosensory and auditory cortices facilitates frequency discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli.
    Iguchi Y; Hoshi Y; Nemoto M; Taira M; Hashimoto I
    Neuroscience; 2007 Aug; 148(2):461-72. PubMed ID: 17640818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual-vestibular stimulation interferes with information processing in young and older humans.
    Furman JM; Müller ML; Redfern MS; Jennings JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 152(3):383-92. PubMed ID: 12920495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
    Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Irrelevant visual stimuli improve auditory task performance.
    Thorne JD; Debener S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 18388737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of auditory signals to the operation of an agricultural vehicle: results of pilot testing.
    Karimi D; Mondor TA; Mann DD
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 18376536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Brain-based limitations in attention and secondary task engagement during high-fidelity driving simulation among young adults.
    Banz BC; Wu J; Camenga DR; Mayes LC; Crowley MJ; Vaca FE
    Neuroreport; 2020 May; 31(8):619-623. PubMed ID: 32366810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving.
    Wester AE; Böcker KB; Volkerts ER; Verster JC; Kenemans JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18215526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Effect of Cognitive Load on Auditory Susceptibility During Automated Driving.
    Van der Heiden RMA; Kenemans JL; Donker SF; Janssen CP
    Hum Factors; 2022 Nov; 64(7):1195-1209. PubMed ID: 33705213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Driver's Cognitive Workload and Driving Performance under Traffic Sign Information Exposure in Complex Environments: A Case Study of the Highways in China.
    Lyu N; Xie L; Wu C; Fu Q; Deng C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 28218696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optic Flow and Tunnel Vision in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2019 Sep; 61(6):992-1003. PubMed ID: 30707630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Driving reaction time before and after primary fusion of the lumbar spine.
    Liebensteiner MC; Birkfellner F; Thaler M; Haid C; Bach C; Krismer M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 20075774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ERPs to infrequent auditory stimuli in two- and three-stimulus versions of the inter-modal oddball task.
    Brown CR; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 19733601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stimulus-focused attention speeds up auditory processing.
    Folyi T; Fehér B; Horváth J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 May; 84(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 22326595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of mental workload on involuntary attention: A somatosensory ERP study.
    Mun S; Whang M; Park S; Park MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():7-20. PubMed ID: 28827155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.