BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28594755)

  • 21. Attitudes toward long-acting reversible contraception among young women seeking abortion.
    Rose SB; Cooper AJ; Baker NK; Lawton B
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Nov; 20(11):1729-35. PubMed ID: 21923281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Uptake and adherence to long-acting reversible contraception post-abortion.
    Rose SB; Lawton BA; Brown SA
    Contraception; 2010 Oct; 82(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 20851228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interest in self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in the United States.
    Upadhyay UD; Zlidar VM; Foster DG
    Contraception; 2016 Oct; 94(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 27326938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Establishing the minimum effective dose and additive effects of depot progestin in suppression of human spermatogenesis by a testosterone depot.
    Handelsman DJ; Conway AJ; Howe CJ; Turner L; Mackey MA
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1996 Nov; 81(11):4113-21. PubMed ID: 8923869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Plan A: postabortion contraception.
    Micks E; Prager S
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 57(4):751-62. PubMed ID: 25254920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Postabortion Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception by Adolescent and Nulliparous Women in New Zealand.
    Rose SB; Garrett SM
    J Adolesc Health; 2016 Feb; 58(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 26603946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception use among Salvadoran women: an in-depth analysis of attitudes and experiences.
    Cremer M; Ditzian L; April A; Peralta E; Klausner D; Podolsky R; Dierking E
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Nov; 20(11):1751-6. PubMed ID: 21823919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Immediate postabortion access to IUDs, implants and DMPA reduces repeat pregnancy within 1 year in a New York City practice.
    Langston AM; Joslin-Roher SL; Westhoff CL
    Contraception; 2014 Feb; 89(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 24309218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception in women with medical problems.
    Frederiksen MC
    J Reprod Med; 1996 May; 41(5 Suppl):414-8. PubMed ID: 8725704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.
    Secura GM; Allsworth JE; Madden T; Mullersman JL; Peipert JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):115.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20541171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.
    Winner B; Peipert JF; Zhao Q; Buckel C; Madden T; Allsworth JE; Secura GM
    N Engl J Med; 2012 May; 366(21):1998-2007. PubMed ID: 22621627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early experience with the contraceptive use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in an inner-city clinic population.
    Polaneczky M; Guarnaccia M; Alon J; Wiley J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 8853283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A cross-sectional study of the forearm bone mineral density in long-term current users of the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.
    Viola AS; Castro S; Bahamondes MV; Fernandes A; Viola CF; Bahamondes L
    Contraception; 2011 Nov; 84(5):e31-7. PubMed ID: 22018135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Depo Provera. Position paper on clinical use, effectiveness and side effects.
    Bigrigg A; Evans M; Gbolade B; Newton J; Pollard L; Szarewski A; Thomas C; Walling M
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 10454658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of trust in health care systems on postabortion contraceptive choice.
    Stacey RE; Dempsey A
    Contraception; 2015 Nov; 92(5):458-62. PubMed ID: 26197264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of previous induced abortions on postabortion contraception selection.
    Keene M; Roston A; Keith L; Patel A
    Contraception; 2015 May; 91(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 25637863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Post-abortion depot medroxyprogesterone acetate continuation rates: a randomized trial of cyclic estradiol.
    Goldberg AB; Cardenas LH; Hubbard AE; Darney PD
    Contraception; 2002 Oct; 66(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 12413614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intra-abortion contraception with etonogestrel subdermal implant.
    Barros Pereira I; Carvalho RM; Graça LM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Feb; 185():33-5. PubMed ID: 25522115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does the type of abortion provider influence contraceptive uptake after abortion? An analysis of longitudinal data from 64 health facilities in Ghana.
    Maxwell L; Voetagbe G; Paul M; Mark A
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Jun; 15():586. PubMed ID: 26104025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Uptake before and after the Affordable Care Act Contraceptive Mandate in Women Undergoing First Trimester Surgical Abortion.
    Bell KN; Meyn LA; Chen BA
    Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(4):301-305. PubMed ID: 29853173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.