These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The f0 perturbation effects in focus marking: Evidence from Korean and Japanese. Chen S; Hong Y; Li B; Chun E PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283139. PubMed ID: 36952566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of f0 shape and phrasal position in Papuan Malay and American English word identification. Kaland C; Gordon MK Phonetica; 2022 Jun; 79(3):219-245. PubMed ID: 35981718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. English Prosodic Focus Marking by Cantonese Trilingual Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder. Wang BX; Chen S; Zhou F; Liu J; Xiao C; Chan A; Tang T J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Mar; 67(3):782-801. PubMed ID: 38354102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-marking prosodic emphasis in Williams syndrome: results of detailed phonetic analysis. Ito K; Martens MA Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Jan; 52(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 27113718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of prosodic hierarchical boundaries in Mandarin Chinese sentences. Li W; Yang Y Neuroscience; 2009 Feb; 158(4):1416-25. PubMed ID: 19111906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prosodic Realization of Focus in Bilingual Production of Southern Min and Mandarin. Chen Y; Xu Y; Guion-Anderson S Phonetica; 2014; 71(4):249-70. PubMed ID: 25997840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phrase boundaries lacking word prosody: An articulatory investigation of Seoul Korean. Jang J; Katsika A J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):3521-3536. PubMed ID: 38809098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: acoustic results. Tabain M J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):516-31. PubMed ID: 12558288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interaction of focus and phrasing with downstep and post-low-bouncing in Mandarin Chinese. Wang B; Kügler F; Genzel S Front Psychol; 2022; 13():884102. PubMed ID: 36248550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prosodic focus marking in clefts and syntactically unmarked equivalents: Prosody-syntax trade-off or additive effects? Arnhold A J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):1390. PubMed ID: 33765786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation. Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring and explaining variation in phrase-final f0 movements in spontaneous Papuan Malay. Kaland C; Grice M Phonetica; 2024 Jun; 81(3):321-349. PubMed ID: 38522003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic detection of prosodic boundaries in spontaneous speech. Biron T; Baum D; Freche D; Matalon N; Ehrmann N; Weinreb E; Biron D; Moses E PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250969. PubMed ID: 33939754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Separability of prosodic phrase boundary and phonemic information. Nakai S; Turk AE J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):966-76. PubMed ID: 21361453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Syntactic Pasts of Nouns Shape Their Prosodic Future: Lexico-Syntactic Effects on Position and Duration. Lester NA; Katsika A Lang Speech; 2024 Sep; 67(3):639-675. PubMed ID: 37403367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phrasal prosody constrains syntactic analysis in toddlers. de Carvalho A; Dautriche I; Lin I; Christophe A Cognition; 2017 Jun; 163():67-79. PubMed ID: 28288369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of prominence in determining the scope of boundary-related lengthening in Greek. Katsika A J Phon; 2016 Mar; 55():149-181. PubMed ID: 27773955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]