These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28595255)

  • 1. Pilot Electroacoustic Analyses of a Sample of Direct-to-Consumer Amplification Products.
    Reed NS; Betz J; Lin FR; Mamo SK
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):804-808. PubMed ID: 28595255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of Personal Sound Amplification Products in Patients With Moderate Hearing Loss: A Pilot Study.
    Kim GY; Kim JS; Jo M; Seol HY; Cho YS; Moon IJ
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 15(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 33541032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applications of direct-to-consumer hearing devices for adults with hearing loss: a review.
    Manchaiah V; Taylor B; Dockens AL; Tran NR; Lane K; Castle M; Grover V
    Clin Interv Aging; 2017; 12():859-871. PubMed ID: 28553093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An electroacoustic analysis of over-the-counter hearing aids.
    Callaway SL; Punch JL
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 18519576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct-to-Consumer Hearing Devices: Capabilities, Costs, and Cosmetics.
    Almufarrij I; Munro KJ; Dawes P; Stone MA; Dillon H
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519858301. PubMed ID: 31280709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing and Speech Perception for People With Hearing Loss Using Personal Sound Amplification Products.
    Kim GY; Kim S; Jo M; Seol HY; Cho YS; Lim J; Moon IJ
    J Korean Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 37(12):e94. PubMed ID: 35347902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(1):1-165. PubMed ID: 32194878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Over-the-counter hearing aids: electroacoustic characteristics and possible target client groups.
    Cheng CM; McPherson B
    Audiology; 2000; 39(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 10882051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective and Subjective Benefit of Direct-to-Consumer Hearing Devices in Middle-Aged Adults.
    Helfer KS; Mamo SK; Clauss M; Dunn L
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):348-358. PubMed ID: 35476927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.
    Kimlinger C; McCreery R; Lewis D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 25690773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
    Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Follow-Up Clinical Trial Evaluating the Consumer-Decides Service Delivery Model.
    Humes LE; Kinney DL; Main AK; Rogers SE
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 30938563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disruptive Hearing Technologies and Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss II: Current Research on Affordable Hearing Technologies and Direct-to-Consumer Models.
    Jilla AM; Johnson CE; Danhauer JL
    Semin Hear; 2018 May; 39(2):146-157. PubMed ID: 29915452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Lost Decade for Change.
    Chan ZY; McPherson B
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():827463. PubMed ID: 26557701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
    Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
    Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fitting Frequency-Lowering Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Updates and Protocols.
    Scollie S; Glista D; Seto J; Dunn A; Schuett B; Hawkins M; Pourmand N; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):219-236. PubMed ID: 26967363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.