These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28595599)

  • 1. Designing persuasive health materials using processing fluency: a literature review.
    Okuhara T; Ishikawa H; Okada M; Kato M; Kiuchi T
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jun; 10(1):198. PubMed ID: 28595599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing fluency effect of a leaflet for breast and cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled study in Japan.
    Okuhara T; Ishikawa H; Goto E; Okada M; Kato M; Kiuchi T
    Psychol Health Med; 2018 Dec; 23(10):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 30101600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. It felt fluent, and I liked it: subjective feeling of fluency rather than objective fluency determines liking.
    Forster M; Leder H; Ansorge U
    Emotion; 2013 Apr; 13(2):280-9. PubMed ID: 23088777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Consensus on the legibility criteria of health education leaflets].
    Barrio-Cantalejo I; Simón-Lorda P; Jiménez MM; Ruiz AM
    An Sist Sanit Navar; 2011; 34(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 21904399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How readable are health education leaflets?
    Ormrod J; Robinson M
    Health Visit; 1994 Dec; 67(12):424-5. PubMed ID: 7829342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing low-literacy health education materials for women.
    Wilson LD
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2011; 36(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 21709522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of stroke patients' and carers' reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information.
    Hoffmann T; McKenna K
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Mar; 60(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 16098708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Designing effective written health education materials: considerations for health professionals.
    Hoffmann T; Worrall L
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 26(19):1166-73. PubMed ID: 15371031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-generated cognitive fluency as an alternative route to preference formation.
    Constable MD; Bayliss AP; Tipper SP; Kritikos A
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Mar; 22(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 23257122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Fluency Amplification Model: fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations.
    Albrecht S; Carbon CC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():195-203. PubMed ID: 24603044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation.
    Alter AL; Oppenheimer DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Aug; 13(3):219-35. PubMed ID: 19638628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer: discrepantly fluent violations are deemed less morally wrong.
    Laham SM; Alter AL; Goodwin GP
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):462-6. PubMed ID: 19573863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer appropriate fluency: Encoding and retrieval interactions in fluency-based memory illusions.
    Lanska M; Westerman D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1001-1012. PubMed ID: 29672114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The readability and suitability of sexual health promotion leaflets.
    Corcoran N; Ahmad F
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Feb; 99(2):284-6. PubMed ID: 26492864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking.
    Westerman DL; Lanska M; Olds JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):426-38. PubMed ID: 25528088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of easy-to-read information material on healthy life-styles written with the help of citizens' collaboration through networking.
    Daghio MM; Fattori G; Ciardullo AV
    Promot Educ; 2006; 13(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 17294709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the readability of skin care and pressure ulcer patient education materials.
    Wilson FL; Williams BN
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2003 Jul; 30(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 12851598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability, suitability and comprehensibility in patient education materials for Swedish patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a mixed method design.
    Smith F; Carlsson E; Kokkinakis D; Forsberg M; Kodeda K; Sawatzky R; Friberg F; Öhlén J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Feb; 94(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 24290242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-appropriate health literacy educational materials in ophthalmology.
    Mikhail D; Visscher KL; Chen N; Wang J; Emara BY; Hutnik CM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 50(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 25677278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Suitability and readability assessment of printed educational materials on hypertension].
    Lee TW; Kang SJ; Kim HH; Woo SR; Kim S
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2011 Jun; 41(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 21804342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.