143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28595775)
1. Surface dose measurements in and out of field: Implications for breast radiotherapy with megavoltage photon beams.
Lonski P; Ramachandran P; Franich R; Kron T
Z Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 27(4):318-323. PubMed ID: 28595775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10MV unflattened photon beams.
Kragl G; af Wetterstedt S; Knäusl B; Lind M; McCavana P; Knöös T; McClean B; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 19592123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flattening filter free vs flattened beams for breast irradiation.
Spruijt KH; Dahele M; Cuijpers JP; Jeulink M; Rietveld D; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):506-13. PubMed ID: 22672750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of phantom scatter from flattened and flattening filter free high-energy photon beams.
Richmond N; Allen V; Daniel J; Dacey R; Walker C
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25454113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinically relevant investigation of flattening filter-free skin dose.
Guy CL; Karki K; Sharma M; Kim S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):140-148. PubMed ID: 27929489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absorbed dose measurements in the build-up region of flattened versus unflattened megavoltage photon beams.
De Puysseleyr A; Lechner W; De Neve W; Georg D; De Wagter C
Z Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 26(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 27020966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating out-of-field doses during radiotherapy of paediatric brain tumours using lead shielding and flattening-filter free beams.
Beierholm AR; Nygaard DE; Juhl EL; Hansen R; Hansen J
Phys Med; 2019 Apr; 60():1-6. PubMed ID: 31000068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MO-A-BRB-02: Facts and Fiction of Flattening Filter Free (FF-FFF) X-Rays Beams.
Ting J
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part20):3861-3862. PubMed ID: 28517518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility study of using flattening-filter-free photon beams to deliver conventional flat beams.
Potter NJ; Lebron S; Li JG; Liu C; Lu B
Med Dosim; 2019 Winter; 44(4):e25-e31. PubMed ID: 30630654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics of flattening filter free beams at low monitor unit settings.
Akino Y; Ota S; Inoue S; Mizuno H; Sumida I; Yoshioka Y; Isohashi F; Ogawa K
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112101. PubMed ID: 24320454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flattening filter free technique in breath-hold treatments of left-sided breast cancer: The effect on beam-on time and dose distributions.
Koivumäki T; Heikkilä J; Väänänen A; Koskela K; Sillanmäki S; Seppälä J
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Jan; 118(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 26709069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an aSi-EPID with flattening filter free beams: applicability to the GLAaS algorithm for portal dosimetry and first experience for pretreatment QA of RapidArc.
Nicolini G; Clivio A; Vanetti E; Krauss H; Fenoglietto P; Cozzi L; Fogliata A
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111719. PubMed ID: 24320427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo comparison of superficial dose between flattening filter free and flattened beams.
Javedan K; Feygelman V; Zhang RR; Moros EG; Correa CR; Trotti A; Li W; Zhang GG
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 24662096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Generation and verification of QFix kVue Calypso-compatible couch top model for a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator with FFF beams.
Gardner SJ; Gulam M; Song K; Li H; Huang Y; Zhao B; Qin Y; Snyder K; Kim J; Gordon J; Chetty IJ; Wen N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):163–180. PubMed ID: 26219010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PERIPHERAL SURFACE DOSE FROM A LINEAR ACCELERATOR: RADIOCHROMIC FILM EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS OF FLATTENING FILTER FREE VERSUS FLATTENED BEAMS.
García-Hernández T; Vicedo-González A; Sánchez-Nieto B; Romero-Expósito M; Roselló-Ferrando J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jun; 188(3):285-298. PubMed ID: 31922571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beam characteristics of energy-matched flattening filter free beams.
Paynter D; Weston SJ; Cosgrove VP; Evans JA; Thwaites DI
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052103. PubMed ID: 24784392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
