These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2859597)

  • 1. Extrapolating and interpolating surfaces in depth.
    Collett TS
    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1985 Mar; 224(1234):43-56. PubMed ID: 2859597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amodal completion with background determines depth from monocular gap stereopsis.
    Grove PM; Ben Sachtler WL; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3771-4. PubMed ID: 16938332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of stereo and texture cues in the formation of discontinuities during three-dimensional surface interpolation.
    Buckley D; Frisby JP; Mayhew JE
    Perception; 1989; 18(5):563-88. PubMed ID: 2602083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
    Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Makino Y; Yano M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binocular depth reversals despite familiarity cues.
    van den Enden A; Spekreijse H
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4907):959-61. PubMed ID: 2727687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms.
    Grove PM; Gillam B; Ono H
    Vision Res; 2002 Jul; 42(15):1859-70. PubMed ID: 12128016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes.
    Shimono K; Tam WJ; Asakura N; Ohmi M
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2631-41. PubMed ID: 16005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining binocular and monocular curvature features.
    Stevens KA; Lees M; Brookes A
    Perception; 1991; 20(4):425-40. PubMed ID: 1771128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting slant-in-depth of real trapezoidal and rectangular surfaces: moving-monocular viewing equivalent to stationary-binocular viewing.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1993 Apr; 120(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 8245918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the Frisby Stereo Test under monocular viewing conditions.
    Cooper J; Feldman J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jul; 50(7):807-9. PubMed ID: 500992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Depth relief.
    Koenderink JJ; van Doorn AJ; Kappers AM
    Perception; 1995; 24(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 7617415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binocular Information Improves the Reliability and Consistency of Pictorial Relief.
    Hibbard PB; Hornsey RL; Asher JM
    Vision (Basel); 2022 Dec; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 36649048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):16. PubMed ID: 23397041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binocular utilization of monocular cues that are undetectable monocularly.
    Julesz B; Oswald HP
    Perception; 1978; 7(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 693231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Monocular Spatial Cues on Vergence Eye Movements in Monocular and Binocular Viewing of 3-D and 2-D Stimuli.
    Batvinionak AA; Gracheva MA; Bolshakov AS; Rozhkova GI
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1077-84. PubMed ID: 26562921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monocular discs in the occlusion zones of binocular surfaces do not have quantitative depth--a comparison with Panum's limiting case.
    Gillam B; Cook M; Blackburn S
    Perception; 2003; 32(8):1009-19. PubMed ID: 14580146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.