358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28595973)
1. Crash probability estimation via quantifying driver hazard perception.
Li Y; Zheng Y; Wang J; Kodaka K; Li K
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():116-125. PubMed ID: 28595973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles' advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems.
Yue L; Abdel-Aty M; Wu Y; Wang L
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():55-64. PubMed ID: 29654988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Associating crash avoidance maneuvers with driver attributes and accident characteristics: a mixed logit model approach.
Kaplan S; Prato CG
Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(3):315-26. PubMed ID: 22607255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
Shah D; Lee C
J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of heterogeneity of car-following behavior on rear-end crash risk.
Zhang J; Wang Y; Lu G
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():275-289. PubMed ID: 30802778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
Gao J; Davis GA
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure.
Zhao P; Lee C
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():149-158. PubMed ID: 29407662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
Cicchino JB
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments.
Kiefer RJ; LeBlanc DJ; Flannagan CA
Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 15667816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting driver reaction time and deceleration: Comparison of perception-reaction thresholds and evidence accumulation framework.
Durrani U; Lee C; Shah D
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105889. PubMed ID: 33248429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
