These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28595973)

  • 21. Characteristics of automatic emergency braking responses in passenger vehicles evaluated in the IIHS front crash prevention program.
    Kidd DG; Perez-Rapela D; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107150. PubMed ID: 37301163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In-depth analysis of drivers' merging behavior and rear-end crash risks in work zone merging areas.
    Weng J; Xue S; Yang Y; Yan X; Qu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():51-61. PubMed ID: 25687332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Yang J; Xue Q
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():416-427. PubMed ID: 35249623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Further development of Motorcycle Autonomous Emergency Braking (MAEB), what can in-depth studies tell us? A multinational study.
    Savino G; Rizzi M; Brown J; Piantini S; Meredith L; Albanese B; Pierini M; Fitzharris M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S165-72. PubMed ID: 25307383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.
    Russo F; Biancardo SA; Dell'Acqua G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medical investigation after a motorcoach strikes the rear of a tractor semitrailer parked on the highway; 13 fatal.
    McKay MP; Poland K; Barth TH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S162-S164. PubMed ID: 30841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting crash-relevant violations at stop sign-controlled intersections for the development of an intersection driver assistance system.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():59-65. PubMed ID: 27586104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A trial of retrofitted advisory collision avoidance technology in government fleet vehicles.
    Thompson JP; Mackenzie JRR; Dutschke JK; Baldock MRJ; Raftery SJ; Wall J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():34-40. PubMed ID: 29544135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Available sight distance on existing highways: Meeting stopping sight distance requirements of an aging population.
    Gargoum SA; Tawfeek MH; El-Basyouny K; Koch JC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Mar; 112():56-68. PubMed ID: 29316487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A forward collision avoidance algorithm based on driver braking behavior.
    Xiong X; Wang M; Cai Y; Chen L; Farah H; Hagenzieker M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():30-43. PubMed ID: 31103877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Potential Occupant Injury Reduction in Pre-Crash System Equipped Vehicles in the Striking Vehicle of Rear-end Crashes.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2010; 54():203-14. PubMed ID: 21050603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The real-world safety potential of connected vehicle technology.
    Doecke S; Grant A; Anderson RW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S31-5. PubMed ID: 26027973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Injury mitigation estimates for an intersection driver assistance system in straight crossing path crashes in the United States.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S9-S17. PubMed ID: 28323447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Towards an assistance strategy that reduces unnecessary collision alarms: An examination of the driver's perceived need for assistance.
    Kaß C; Schmidt GJ; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 30035557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.