104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28596320)
1. Rethinking the dreaded r-word.
Enserink M
Science; 2017 Jun; 356(6342):998. PubMed ID: 28596320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self-correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction.
Vorland CJ; Brown AW; Ejima K; Mayo-Wilson E; Valdez D; Allison DB
Eur J Clin Invest; 2020 Feb; 50(2):e13190. PubMed ID: 31788792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retraction challenges.
Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):5. PubMed ID: 25279879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Retraction notice.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Update on Scholarly Publication Ethics: Navigating the Confusing Landscape.
Reid C; Cress P
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1195-1197. PubMed ID: 27329663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Retractions by Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences due to Scientific Misconduct.
Jawaid SA; Jawaid M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Aug; 26(8):718-9. PubMed ID: 27539774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When the data won't get you there: the ethics of scientific error, and worse.
Jones JW; McCullough LB; Richman BW
J Vasc Surg; 2006 Jun; 43(6):1308-10. PubMed ID: 16765262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. On rejection, resilience, and retraction.
Lanzafame RJ
Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Jan; 31(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23234336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Communication: Science is not about simple stories.
Bergmann J
Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7475):198. PubMed ID: 24226880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct. Reviewer's déjà vu, French science sleuthing uncover plagiarized papers.
Balter M
Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6073):1157-8. PubMed ID: 22403360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.
Hoppeler H; Handel M; Moulton OC
J Exp Biol; 2008 Dec; 211(Pt 23):3651. PubMed ID: 19011202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Correcting the scientific record.
Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Ethics of Ironic Science in Its Search for Spoof.
Ronagh M; Souder L
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1537-49. PubMed ID: 25510233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A painful remedy.
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):6. PubMed ID: 21048718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
