These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28596601)

  • 1. Ebbinghaus figures that deceive the eye do not necessarily deceive the hand.
    Knol H; Huys R; Sarrazin JC; Spiegler A; Jirsa VK
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3111. PubMed ID: 28596601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements.
    Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined visual illusion effects on the perceived index of difficulty and movement outcomes in discrete and continuous fitts' tapping.
    Alphonsa S; Dai B; Benham-Deal T; Zhu Q
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 25535018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target-context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion.
    Knol H; Huys R; Sarrazin JC; Jirsa VK
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1679. PubMed ID: 26583002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.
    Aglioti S; DeSouza JF; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 1995 Jun; 5(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 7552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dorsal and ventral visual stream contributions to perception-action interactions during pointing.
    Lee JH; van Donkelaar P
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 11914789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions.
    van Donkelaar P
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Apr; 125(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 10323299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp.
    Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 2001 Feb; 11(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11231152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: a multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action.
    Mendoza J; Hansen S; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Elliott D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2005; 24(5-6):760-73. PubMed ID: 16223538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Ebbinghaus illusion in the gray bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium griseum) in comparison to the teleost damselfish (Chromis chromis).
    Fuss T; Schluessel V
    Zoology (Jena); 2017 Aug; 123():16-29. PubMed ID: 28712674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The functional subdivision of the visual brain: Is there a real illusion effect on action? A multi-lab replication study.
    Kopiske KK; Bruno N; Hesse C; Schenk T; Franz VH
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():130-52. PubMed ID: 27156056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Ebbinghaus illusion modulates visual search for size-defined targets: evidence for preattentive processing of apparent object size.
    Busch A; Müller HJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):475-95. PubMed ID: 15283072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Looking at the Ebbinghaus illusion: differences in neurocomputational requirements, not gaze-mediated attention, explain a classic perception-action dissociation.
    Whitwell RL; Garach MA; Goodale MA; Sperandio I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1869):20210459. PubMed ID: 36511402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating the Influence of Perceptual Biases and Contextual Artifacts Within Target Configurations During the Planning and Control of Visually Guided Action.
    Roberts JW; Gerber N; Wakefield CJ; Simmonds PJ
    Motor Control; 2021 Apr; 25(3):349-368. PubMed ID: 33811190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):920-50. PubMed ID: 19378412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ebbinghaus illusion: context, contour, and age influence the judged size of a circle amidst circles.
    Weintraub DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):353-64. PubMed ID: 528945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rescaling retinal size into perceived size: evidence for an occipital and parietal bottleneck.
    Kreutzer S; Weidner R; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 27(7):1334-43. PubMed ID: 25603028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual perception in domestic dogs: susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus-Titchener and Delboeuf illusions.
    Byosiere SE; Feng LC; Woodhead JK; Rutter NJ; Chouinard PA; Howell TJ; Bennett PC
    Anim Cogn; 2017 May; 20(3):435-448. PubMed ID: 28008543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Ebbinghaus illusion: new contextual effects and theoretical considerations.
    Jaeger T; Klahs K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2015 Feb; 120(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 25650507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.