These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28597224)

  • 21. Cell viscoelasticity is linked to fluctuations in cell biomass distributions.
    Nguyen TL; Polanco ER; Patananan AN; Zangle TA; Teitell MA
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7403. PubMed ID: 32366921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Subsurface Imaging of Cell Organelles by Force Microscopy.
    Guerrero CR; Garcia PD; Garcia R
    ACS Nano; 2019 Aug; 13(8):9629-9637. PubMed ID: 31356042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetically-modulated atomic force microscopy for analysis of soft matter systems.
    Kageshima M
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2012 Nov; 13(14):2575-88. PubMed ID: 22039807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Direct measurement of single-molecule visco-elasticity in atomic force microscope force-extension experiments.
    Bippes CA; Humphris AD; Stark M; Müller DJ; Janovjak H
    Eur Biophys J; 2006 Feb; 35(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 16237549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Initial dynamic viscoelasticity change of composites during light curing.
    Kim MH; Min SH; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 20170947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantification of liver viscoelasticity with acoustic radiation force: a study of hepatic fibrosis in a rat model.
    Chen X; Shen Y; Zheng Y; Lin H; Guo Y; Zhu Y; Zhang X; Wang T; Chen S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 39(11):2091-102. PubMed ID: 23993170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Atomic force microscopy: influence of air drying and fixation on the morphology and viscoelasticity of cultured cells.
    Weyn B; Kalle W; Kumar-Singh S; Van Marck E; Tanke H; Jacob W
    J Microsc; 1998 Feb; 189(Pt 2):172-80. PubMed ID: 9503661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characterization of blood clot viscoelasticity by dynamic ultrasound elastography and modeling of the rheological behavior.
    Schmitt C; Hadj Henni A; Cloutier G
    J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):622-9. PubMed ID: 21122863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. AFM-based study of fullerenol (C60(OH)24)-induced changes of elasticity in living SMCC-7721 cells.
    Liu Y; Wang Z; Wang X
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 May; 45():65-74. PubMed ID: 25682196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope.
    Radmacher M; Fritz M; Kacher CM; Cleveland JP; Hansma PK
    Biophys J; 1996 Jan; 70(1):556-67. PubMed ID: 8770233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cancer cell viscoelasticity measurement by quantitative phase and flow stress induction.
    Vicar T; Chmelik J; Navratil J; Kolar R; Chmelikova L; Cmiel V; Jagos J; Provaznik I; Masarik M; Gumulec J
    Biophys J; 2022 May; 121(9):1632-1642. PubMed ID: 35390297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Viscoelasticity of Native and Artificial Actin Cortices Assessed by Nanoindentation Experiments.
    Hubrich H; Mey IP; Brückner BR; Mühlenbrock P; Nehls S; Grabenhorst L; Oswald T; Steinem C; Janshoff A
    Nano Lett; 2020 Sep; 20(9):6329-6335. PubMed ID: 32786944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Myosin 1G (Myo1G) is a haematopoietic specific myosin that localises to the plasma membrane and regulates cell elasticity.
    Olety B; Wälte M; Honnert U; Schillers H; Bähler M
    FEBS Lett; 2010 Feb; 584(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 19968988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A general approach for the microrheology of cancer cells by atomic force microscopy.
    Wang B; Lançon P; Bienvenu C; Vierling P; Di Giorgio C; Bossis G
    Micron; 2013 Jan; 44():287-97. PubMed ID: 22951283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the viscoelastic properties of cells from different kidney cancer phenotypes measured with atomic force microscopy.
    Rebelo LM; de Sousa JS; Mendes Filho J; Radmacher M
    Nanotechnology; 2013 Feb; 24(5):055102. PubMed ID: 23324556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy.
    Mahaffy RE; Park S; Gerde E; Käs J; Shih CK
    Biophys J; 2004 Mar; 86(3):1777-93. PubMed ID: 14990504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of skin viscoelasticity and anisotropy by measurement of speed of shear wave propagation with viscoelasticity skin analyzer.
    Vexler A; Polyansky I; Gorodetsky R
    J Invest Dermatol; 1999 Nov; 113(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 10571727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Viscoelasticity of rabbit vocal folds after injection augmentation.
    Dahlqvist A; Gärskog O; Laurent C; Hertegård S; Ambrosio L; Borzacchiello A
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 14710010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Elastic properties of epithelial cells probed by atomic force microscopy.
    Brückner BR; Janshoff A
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Nov; 1853(11 Pt B):3075-82. PubMed ID: 26193077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frequency dependence of viscous and viscoelastic dissipation in coated micro-cantilevers from noise measurement.
    Paolino P; Bellon L
    Nanotechnology; 2009 Oct; 20(40):405705. PubMed ID: 19738311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.