These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28597721)

  • 1. Dynamics of problem setting and framing in citizen discussions on synthetic biology.
    Betten AW; Broerse JEW; Kupper F
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Apr; 27(3):294-309. PubMed ID: 28597721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Let's (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues.
    Bauer A; Bogner A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jul; 29(5):492-507. PubMed ID: 32122265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frame Reflection Lab: a Playful Method for Frame Reflection on Synthetic Biology.
    van der Meij MG; Heltzel AALM; Broerse JEW; Kupper F
    Nanoethics; 2018; 12(2):155-172. PubMed ID: 30100947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Designing synthetic biology.
    Agapakis CM
    ACS Synth Biol; 2014 Mar; 3(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 24156739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mundane science use in a practice theoretical perspective: Different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public communication initiatives build on scientific claims.
    Halkier B
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Jan; 26(1):40-54. PubMed ID: 26276759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The synthetic biology puzzle: a qualitative study on public reflections towards a governance framework.
    Starkbaum J; Braun M; Dabrock P
    Syst Synth Biol; 2015 Dec; 9(4):147-157. PubMed ID: 28392848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "That was not the discussion we wanted to have": Engagement of civil society organizations with synthetic biology.
    Fuchs D; Bauer A; Bogner A
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Aug; 32(6):676-690. PubMed ID: 37092655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constructing future scenarios as a tool to foster responsible research and innovation among future synthetic biologists.
    Betten AW; Rerimassie V; Broerse JEW; Stemerding D; Kupper F
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2018 Sep; 14(1):21. PubMed ID: 30198056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synthetic biology and the prospects for responsible innovation.
    Macnaghten P; Owen R; Jackson R
    Essays Biochem; 2016 Nov; 60(4):347-355. PubMed ID: 27903822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
    Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intellectual property rights, standards and data exchange in systems biology: Reflections from the IP Expert Meeting at the University of Luxembourg, 8-9 October 2015, ERASysAPP - ERA-Net for Systems Biology Applications.
    van Zimmeren E; Rutz B; Minssen T
    Biotechnol J; 2016 Dec; 11(12):1477-1480. PubMed ID: 27966844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negotiating the dynamics of uncomfortable knowledge: The case of dual use and synthetic biology.
    Marris C; Jefferson C; Lentzos F
    Biosocieties; 2014 Nov; 9(4):393-420. PubMed ID: 25484910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Societal impact of synthetic biology: responsible research and innovation (RRI).
    Gregorowius D; Deplazes-Zemp A
    Essays Biochem; 2016 Nov; 60(4):371-379. PubMed ID: 27903824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes.
    Todd K; Haupt G; Kollmann EK; Pfeifle S
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2018; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 29904531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical Development of Artificial Amniotic Sac and Placenta Technology: A Roadmap.
    Verweij EJ; De Proost L; van Laar JOEH; Frank L; Obermann-Borstn SA; Vermeulen MJ; van Baalen S; van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Kingma E
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():793308. PubMed ID: 34956991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Art-Science Collaboration in an EPSRC/BBSRC-Funded Synthetic Biology UK Research Centre.
    Reinsborough M
    Nanoethics; 2020; 14(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 32435319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of quantitative and qualitative studies on U.S. public perceptions of synthetic biology.
    Pauwels E
    Syst Synth Biol; 2009 Dec; 3(1-4):37-46. PubMed ID: 19816798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective Technology Assessment of Synthetic Biology: Fundamental and Propaedeutic Reflections in Order to Enable an Early Assessment.
    Schmidt JC
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1151-1170. PubMed ID: 26160061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What does "Diversity" Mean for Public Engagement in Science? A New Metric for Innovation Ecosystem Diversity.
    Özdemir V; Springer S
    OMICS; 2018 Mar; 22(3):184-189. PubMed ID: 29431577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Citizen science: a new direction in canine behavior research.
    Hecht J; Spicer Rice E
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jan; 110():125-32. PubMed ID: 25444773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.