110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28597834)
1. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study.
Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study.
Cassetta M; Pranno N; Stasolla A; Orsogna N; Fierro D; Cavallini C; Cantisani V
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170051. PubMed ID: 28452576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein FH; Asbach P; Beuer F; Glienke J; Mayer S; Zachriat C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):281-289. PubMed ID: 26984824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.
Elison JM; Leggitt VL; Thomson M; Oyoyo U; Wycliffe ND
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 18929275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head.
Zhylich D; Krishnan P; Muthusami P; Rayner T; Shroff M; Doria A; Tompson B; Lou W; Suri S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):484-499. PubMed ID: 28257733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic capability of magnetic resonance imaging in the head and neck region: A systematic review.
Hasanin M; Kaplan SEF; Hohlen B; Lai C; Nagshabandi R; Zhu X; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 31285157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induced magnetic moment in stainless steel components of orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T MRI scanners.
Wang ZJ; Rollins NK; Liang H; Park YJ
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5871-8. PubMed ID: 26429261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners.
Sonesson M; Al-Qabandi F; Månsson S; Abdulraheem S; Bondemark L; Hellén-Halme K
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 33828963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic compatibility of various fixed orthodontic retainers for head/neck MRI and dental MRI.
Juerchott A; Roser CJ; Saleem MA; Nittka M; Lux CJ; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 May; 27(5):2375-2384. PubMed ID: 36640179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies.
Ozawa E; Honda EI; Parakonthun KN; Ohmori H; Shimazaki K; Kurabayashi T; Ono T
Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 29457192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets.
Pratten DH; Popli K; Germane N; Gunsolley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Nov; 98(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 2239837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.
Dobai A; Dembrovszky F; Vízkelety T; Barsi P; Juhász F; Dobó-Nagy C
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):298. PubMed ID: 35854295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Enamel wear from ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets].
Viazis AD
Orthod Epitheor; 1989 Dec; 1(4):167-74. PubMed ID: 2486317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quantitative AFM analysis of nano-scale surface roughness in various orthodontic brackets.
Lee GJ; Park KH; Park YG; Park HK
Micron; 2010 Oct; 41(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 20646928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
