152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28598832)
1. Combination of conventional ultrasonography and virtual touch tissue imaging quantification for differential diagnosis of breast lesions smaller than 10 mm.
Zhang SP; Zeng Z; Liu H; Yao MH; Xu G; Wu R
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 67(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 28598832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Kong WT; Zhou WJ; Wang Y; Zhuang XM; Wu M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2019 Oct; 46(4):459-466. PubMed ID: 31102067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for Evaluation of Ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System Category 4 Lesions.
Li XL; Xu HX; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Huang X; Li DD; Guo LH; Xu JM; Sun LP; Fang L; Xu XH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2050-7. PubMed ID: 27174418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combination of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging and Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification for Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.
Teke M; Göya C; Teke F; Uslukaya Ö; Hamidi C; Çetinçakmak MG; Hattapoğlu S; Alan B; Tekbaş G
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jul; 34(7):1201-8. PubMed ID: 26112622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification and Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for diagnosis of solid breast tumors of different sizes.
Chen YP; Han T; Wu R; Yao MH; Xu G; Zhao LX; Liu H; Pu H; Fang Y
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2016 Nov; 64(2):235-244. PubMed ID: 27814284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography for determining benign versus malignant cervical lymph nodes: a comparison with conventional ultrasound.
Kılıç A; Çolakoğlu Er H
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2019 Mar; 25(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 30774094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging and Quantification in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules.
Zhou H; Zhou XL; Xu HX; Li DD; Liu BJ; Zhang YF; Xu JM; Bo XW; Li XL; Guo LH; Qu S
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Feb; 36(2):251-260. PubMed ID: 27914177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual touch imaging quantification shear-wave elastography for breast lesions: the diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative features.
Luo T; Zhang JW; Zhu Y; Jia XH; Dong YJ; Zhan WW; Zhou JQ
Clin Radiol; 2021 Apr; 76(4):316.e1-316.e8. PubMed ID: 33328105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic performance of shear wave velocity ratio for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: Compared with VTQ, and mammography.
Zhong LC; Yang T; Gu LP; Ma F
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2021; 77(2):123-131. PubMed ID: 32924988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of conventional ultrasound, ultrasound elasticity imaging, and acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for prediction of malignancy in breast lesions.
Zhang S; Wan J; Liu H; Yao M; Xiang L; Fang Y; Jia L; Wu R
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 74(3):241-253. PubMed ID: 31683464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different precompression does not reduce the diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification (VTIQ) in breast lesions, especially for the ratio of the shear wave velocity between lesions and surrounding tissues.
Wang A; Zhong J; Wang S; Wang H; Tao L; Wei H; Chen X; Zhou X; Sun J
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 151():110284. PubMed ID: 35390603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing Unnecessary Biopsy of Breast Lesions: Preliminary Results with Combination of Strain and Shear-Wave Elastography.
Han J; Li F; Peng C; Huang Y; Lin Q; Liu Y; Cao L; Zhou J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 45(9):2317-2327. PubMed ID: 31221510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined value of Virtual Touch tissue quantification and conventional sonographic features for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules smaller than 10 mm.
Zhang H; Shi Q; Gu J; Jiang L; Bai M; Liu L; Wu Y; Du L
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Feb; 33(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 24449728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification: value in malignancy prediction for complex cystic and solid breast lesions.
Zhang Y; Zhao CK; Li XL; He YP; Ren WW; Zou CP; Du YW; Xu HX
Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):7807. PubMed ID: 28798325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification (VTIQ) in the evaluation of breast lesions: The associated factors leading to misdiagnosis.
Sun JW; Wang XL; Zhao Q; Zhou H; Tao L; Jiang ZP; Zhang WY; Zhou XL
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():97-104. PubMed ID: 30599880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of VTIQ as a new tissue strain analytics measurement technique in testicular lesions.
Trottmann M; Marcon J; D'Anastasi M; Karl A; Stief CG; Reiser M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2014; 58(1):195-209. PubMed ID: 25267458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preliminary Evaluation of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for Differential Diagnosis of Metastatic and Nonmetastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Zhao Y; Xi J; Zhao B; Xiong W; Jiang D; Yang L; Cai Z; Liu T; Jiang H; Rong S; Jin X
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Mar; 36(3):557-563. PubMed ID: 28127781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Performance of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) Combined with Shear-Wave Elastography in Evaluating Breast Lesions.
Zhu YC; Zhang Y; Deng SH; Jiang Q
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Aug; 24():5935-5942. PubMed ID: 30145602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel two-dimensional quantitative shear wave elastography to make differential diagnosis of breast lesions: Comprehensive evaluation and influencing factors.
Yao MH; Wu R; Xu G; Zhao LX; Liu H; Pu H; Fang Y
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2016 Nov; 64(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 27814283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
