147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28599552)
1. The development of gaze to a speaking face.
Irwin J; Brancazio L; Volpe N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3145. PubMed ID: 28599552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Look who's talking!" Gaze Patterns for Implicit and Explicit Audio-Visual Speech Synchrony Detection in Children With High-Functioning Autism.
Grossman RB; Steinhart E; Mitchell T; McIlvane W
Autism Res; 2015 Jun; 8(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 25620208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of acoustic fine structure cues on the recognition of auditory-only and audiovisual speech.
Meister H; Fuersen K; Schreitmueller S; Walger M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3116. PubMed ID: 27369134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expectations and speech intelligibility.
Babel M; Russell J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2823-33. PubMed ID: 25994710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Face-viewing patterns predict audiovisual speech integration in autistic children.
Feng S; Lu H; Wang Q; Li T; Fang J; Chen L; Yi L
Autism Res; 2021 Dec; 14(12):2592-2602. PubMed ID: 34415113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual differences in speech-in-noise perception parallel neural speech processing and attention in preschoolers.
Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; White-Schwoch T; Otto-Meyer S; Kraus N
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():148-157. PubMed ID: 27864051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of visual distraction on auditory-visual speech perception by younger and older listeners.
Cohen JI; Gordon-Salant S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):EL470. PubMed ID: 28599569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utilization of visual information and listener strategies in intelligibility impairment related to bilateral facial paresis.
Keintz C
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21682545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A virtual speaker in noisy classroom conditions: supporting or disrupting children's listening comprehension?
Nirme J; Haake M; Lyberg Åhlander V; Brännström J; Sahlén B
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Jul; 44(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 29619859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Congruent Visual Speech Enhances Cortical Entrainment to Continuous Auditory Speech in Noise-Free Conditions.
Crosse MJ; Butler JS; Lalor EC
J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 35(42):14195-204. PubMed ID: 26490860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments.
Brungart DS; Sheffield BM; Kubli LR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):777-90. PubMed ID: 25096112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face communication with proficient alaryngeal speakers: a preliminary study.
Evitts P; Gallop R
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(5):535-49. PubMed ID: 21899671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is children's listening effort in background noise influenced by the speaker's voice quality?
Sahlén B; Haake M; von Lochow H; Holm L; Kastberg T; Brännström KJ; Lyberg-Åhlander V
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Jul; 43(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 28511620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The contribution of dynamic visual cues to audiovisual speech perception.
Jaekl P; Pesquita A; Alsius A; Munhall K; Soto-Faraco S
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():402-10. PubMed ID: 26100561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
