These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28599552)

  • 21. High visual resolution matters in audiovisual speech perception, but only for some.
    Alsius A; Wayne RV; Paré M; Munhall KG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1472-87. PubMed ID: 27150616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of noise and audiovisual cues on speech processing in adults with and without ADHD.
    Michalek AM; Watson SM; Ash I; Ringleb S; Raymer A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 24456181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eye Gaze and Perceptual Adaptation to Audiovisual Degraded Speech.
    Banks B; Gowen E; Munro KJ; Adank P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 64(9):3432-3445. PubMed ID: 34463528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech?
    Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.
    Gustafson SJ; Billings CJ; Hornsby BWY; Key AP
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():103-112. PubMed ID: 30660965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech intelligibility of virtual humans.
    Devesse A; Dudek A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):908-916. PubMed ID: 30261770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory detection of non-speech and speech stimuli in noise: Native speech advantage.
    Huo S; Tao S; Wang W; Li M; Dong Q; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL161. PubMed ID: 27250202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
    Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Read my lips! Perception of speech in noise by preschool children with autism and the impact of watching the speaker's face.
    Newman RS; Kirby LA; Von Holzen K; Redcay E
    J Neurodev Disord; 2021 Jan; 13(1):4. PubMed ID: 33402099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Audiovisual training is better than auditory-only training for auditory-only speech-in-noise identification.
    Lidestam B; Moradi S; Pettersson R; Ricklefs T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL142-7. PubMed ID: 25096138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Increasing audiovisual speech integration in autism through enhanced attention to mouth.
    Feng S; Wang Q; Hu Y; Lu H; Li T; Song C; Fang J; Chen L; Yi L
    Dev Sci; 2023 Jul; 26(4):e13348. PubMed ID: 36394129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual speech information: a help or hindrance in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 25786958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning to use an artificial visual cue in speech identification.
    Stephens JD; Holt LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2138-49. PubMed ID: 20968384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pure linguistic interference during comprehension of competing speech signals.
    Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P; Kösem A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL249. PubMed ID: 28372048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.
    Kaplan E; Jesse A
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107724. PubMed ID: 31323242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A relationship between processing speech in noise and dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA; Baese-Berk M; Van Engen K; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4660. PubMed ID: 28679257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of linear and nonlinear speech rate changes on speech intelligibility in stationary and fluctuating maskers.
    Cooke M; Aubanel V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4126. PubMed ID: 28618803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.
    Wu C; Cao S; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL281-5. PubMed ID: 23556692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.