These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28599570)

  • 1. Erratum: Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141(1), 613-623 (2017)].
    Horn DL; Dudley DJ; Dedhia K; Nie K; Drennan WR; Won JH; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):2977. PubMed ID: 28599570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.
    Jeon EK; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Henry BA; Gantz BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2350-8. PubMed ID: 26520316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral weighting strategies for sentences measured by a correlational method.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3827-36. PubMed ID: 17552730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectral weighting strategies for hearing-impaired listeners measured using a correlational method.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2367-78. PubMed ID: 18397039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Erratum: Double-pass consistency for amplitude- and frequency-modulation detection in normal-hearing listeners [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 150, 3631-3647 (2021)].
    Attia S; King A; Varnet L; Ponsot E; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1180. PubMed ID: 35232119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Erratum: A crew of listeners with no more than "slight" hearing loss who exhibit binaural deficits also exhibit reduced amounts of binaural interference [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 150, 2977-2984 (2021)].
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):95. PubMed ID: 35105005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensorineural hearing loss enhances auditory sensitivity and temporal integration for amplitude modulation.
    Wallaert N; Moore BC; Ewert SD; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):971. PubMed ID: 28253641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Algorithms for separating the speech of interfering talkers: evaluations with voiced sentences, and normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stubbs RJ; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jan; 87(1):359-72. PubMed ID: 2299046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation in electric hearing.
    Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Aug; 108(2):760-3. PubMed ID: 10955643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectral weights for overall level discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Doherty KA; Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1053-8. PubMed ID: 8609288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of temporal waveform shape on spectral discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2074-82. PubMed ID: 8227749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.
    Horn DL; Dudley DJ; Dedhia K; Nie K; Drennan WR; Won JH; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):613. PubMed ID: 28147578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency glide discrimination in the F2 region by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3825-32. PubMed ID: 7790660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation.
    Moore BC; Skrodzka E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):327-35. PubMed ID: 11833538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Villchur revisited: another look at automatic gain control simulation of recruiting hearing loss.
    Duchnowski P; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3170-81. PubMed ID: 8550941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
    Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Desmond JM; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Erratum: Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138, 674-686 (2015)].
    Wood KC; Bizley JK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3043. PubMed ID: 27369125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.