These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28599570)

  • 21. Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired.
    Tyler RS; Hall JW; Glasberg BR; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1363-8. PubMed ID: 6512098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Level discrimination of single tones in a multitone complex by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Doherty KA; Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1831-40. PubMed ID: 10089606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of cochlear hearing loss on perceptual grouping cues in competing-vowel perception.
    Rossi-Katz JA; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2588-98. PubMed ID: 16266179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comments on "Evaluating a speech-reception threshold model for hearing-impaired listeners" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2879-2885 (1993)].
    Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):586-9. PubMed ID: 8064024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal overshoot in simultaneous-masked psychophysical tuning curves from normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kimberley BP; Nelson DA; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1660-5. PubMed ID: 2708681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting effects of hearing-instrument signal processing on consonant perception.
    Zaar J; Schmitt N; Derleth RP; DiNino M; Arenberg JG; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3216. PubMed ID: 29195458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting consonant recognition and confusions in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zaar J; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1051. PubMed ID: 28253684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptual grouping of tone sequences by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rose MM; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1768-78. PubMed ID: 9301054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Erratum: Modeling sound-source localization in sagittal planes for human listeners [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 791-802 (2014)].
    Baumgartner R; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2456. PubMed ID: 27794316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Erratum: A Legendre-Galerkin spectral method for constructing atmospheric acoustic normal modes [J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
    Evans RB; Di X; Gilbert KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Dec; 144(6):3117. PubMed ID: 30599641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sensorineural hearing loss impairs sensitivity but spares temporal integration for detection of frequency modulation.
    Wallaert N; Varnet L; Moore BCJ; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):720. PubMed ID: 30180712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Erratum: Factors limiting vocal-tract length discrimination in cochlear implant simulations [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 137(3), 1298-1308 (2015)].
    Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1734. PubMed ID: 27106320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Macaque thresholds for detecting increases in intensity: effects of formant structure.
    Le Prell CG; Niemiec AJ; Moody DB
    Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 162(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 11707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Erratum: Re-examining the relationship between number of cochlear implant channels and maximal speech intelligibility [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142(6), EL537-EL543 (2017)].
    Croghan NBH; Duran SI; Smith ZM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):2621. PubMed ID: 29857764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Erratum: Cognitive disruption by noise-vocoded speech stimuli: Effects of spectral variation [J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
    Senan T; Jelfs S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1330. PubMed ID: 30424614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.