These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28600330)

  • 1. Grading evidence from test accuracy studies: what makes it challenging compared with the grading of effectiveness studies?
    Rogozińska E; Khan K
    Evid Based Med; 2017 Jun; 22(3):81-84. PubMed ID: 28600330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chapter 7: grading a body of evidence on diagnostic tests.
    Singh S; Chang SM; Matchar DB; Bass EB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S47-55. PubMed ID: 22648675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable.
    Gopalakrishna G; Mustafa RA; Davenport C; Scholten RJ; Hyde C; Brozek J; Schünemann HJ; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM; Langendam MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):760-8. PubMed ID: 24725643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.
    Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Guyatt G; Akl EA; Oxman A; Wilson K; Puhan MA; Wilt T; Gutterman D; Woodhead M; Antman EM; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 23256168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to conduct a high-quality systematic review on diagnostic research topics.
    Yao X; Vella E; Brouwers M
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 29549907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy: a GRADE concept paper.
    Hultcrantz M; Mustafa RA; Leeflang MMG; Lavergne V; Estrada-Orozco K; Ansari MT; Izcovich A; Singh J; Chong LY; Rutjes A; Steingart K; Stein A; Sekercioglu N; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Morgan RL; Guyatt G; Bossuyt P; Langendam MW; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():138-148. PubMed ID: 31112801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy.
    Yang B; Mustafa RA; Bossuyt PM; Brozek J; Hultcrantz M; Leeflang MMG; Schünemann HJ; Langendam MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():146-156. PubMed ID: 33864930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 12511664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The GRACE checklist for rating the quality of observational studies of comparative effectiveness: a tale of hope and caution.
    Dreyer NA; Velentgas P; Westrich K; Dubois R
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2014 Mar; 20(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 24564810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Campbell JM; Klugar M; Ding S; Carmody DP; Hakonsen SJ; Jadotte YT; White S; Munn Z
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):154-62. PubMed ID: 26355602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. STARD statement: still room for improvement in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):713-4. PubMed ID: 18710968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; De Vet HC;
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 12818829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy according to a standard method; the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD)].
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Feb; 147(8):336-40. PubMed ID: 12661118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 119(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12520693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Murad MH; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Jaeschke R; Lange S; Meerpohl J; Langendam M; Hultcrantz M; Vist GE; Akl EA; Helfand M; Santesso N; Hooft L; Scholten R; Rosen M; Rutjes A; Crowther M; Muti P; Raatz H; Ansari MT; Williams J; Kunz R; Harris J; Rodriguez IA; Kohli M; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():129-141. PubMed ID: 32060007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chapter 5: assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies.
    Santaguida PL; Riley CM; Matchar DB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-8. PubMed ID: 22648673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    McQueen M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):1. PubMed ID: 12636041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.