These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28600872)

  • 1. Anatomy of a decision II: Potential effects of changes to Tier I chemical approaches in Canadian Disposal at Sea program sediment assessment protocols.
    Apitz SE; Agius S
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1072-1085. PubMed ID: 28600872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomy of a decision III: Evaluation of national disposal at sea program action level efficacy considering 2 chemical action levels.
    Apitz SE; Vivian C; Agius S
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1086-1099. PubMed ID: 28387998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomy of a decision: potential regulatory outcomes from changes to chemistry protocols in the Canadian Disposal at Sea Program.
    Apitz SE; Agius S
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Apr; 69(1-2):76-90. PubMed ID: 23434383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards the assessment and management of contaminated dredged materials.
    Agius SJ; Porebski L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Apr; 4(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 17994915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of bioassays in toxicological hazard, risk and impact assessments of dredged sediments.
    Schipper CA; Rietjens IM; Burgess RM; Murk AJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2010 Nov; 60(11):2026-42. PubMed ID: 20850157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New approach to weight-of-evidence assessment of ecotoxicological effects in regulatory decision-making.
    Hall AT; Belanger SE; Guiney PD; Galay-Burgos M; Maack G; Stubblefield W; Martin O
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):573-579. PubMed ID: 28383801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of sediment quality guidelines for predicting toxicity: the case of the St. Lawrence River.
    Desrosiers M; Babut MP; Pelletier M; Bélanger C; Thibodeau S; Martel L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Apr; 6(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 20821687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment of endocrine active substances.
    Leopold A; Roberts M; Matthiessen P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):264-266. PubMed ID: 27862919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations.
    Arnold SM; Greggs B; Goyak KO; Landenberger BD; Mason AM; Howard B; Zaleski RT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 28294522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits and limits of sediment toxicity tests as an aid to decision-making.
    Volatier L; Clément B; Devaux A; Durrieu C; Bedell JP; Perrodin Y
    Environ Technol; 2009 Jul; 30(8):865-70. PubMed ID: 19705671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current limitations and recommendations to improve testing for the environmental assessment of endocrine active substances.
    Coady KK; Biever RC; Denslow ND; Gross M; Guiney PD; Holbech H; Karouna-Renier NK; Katsiadaki I; Krueger H; Levine SL; Maack G; Williams M; Wolf JC; Ankley GT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):302-316. PubMed ID: 27791330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population-relevant endpoints in the evaluation of endocrine-active substances (EAS) for ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment.
    Marty MS; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Constantine L; Kloas W; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Meador J; Pickford D; Schwarz T; Verslycke T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):317-330. PubMed ID: 28052490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommended approaches to the scientific evaluation of ecotoxicological hazards and risks of endocrine-active substances.
    Matthiessen P; Ankley GT; Biever RC; Bjerregaard P; Borgert C; Brugger K; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Coady KK; Constantine L; Dang Z; Denslow ND; Dreier DA; Dungey S; Gray LE; Gross M; Guiney PD; Hecker M; Holbech H; Iguchi T; Kadlec S; Karouna-Renier NK; Katsiadaki I; Kawashima Y; Kloas W; Krueger H; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Leopold A; Levine SL; Maack G; Marty S; Meador J; Mihaich E; Odum J; Ortego L; Parrott J; Pickford D; Roberts M; Schaefers C; Schwarz T; Solomon K; Verslycke T; Weltje L; Wheeler JR; Williams M; Wolf JC; Yamazaki K
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):267-279. PubMed ID: 28127947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking sediment chemical and biological guidelines for characterization of dredged material.
    Casado-Martínez MC; Riba I; Blasco J; DelValls TA
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2005; 40(2):289-303. PubMed ID: 15717777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermediate-tier options in the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products for soil invertebrates-Synthesis of a workshop.
    Ernst G; Amorim MJB; Bottoms M; Brooks AC; Hodson ME; Kimmel S; Kotschik P; Marx MT; Natal-da-Luz T; Pelosi C; Pieper S; Schimera A; Scott-Fordsmand J; Sharples A; Sousa JP; van Gestel CAM; van Hall B; Bergtold M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 May; 20(3):780-793. PubMed ID: 37563990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the reliability of ecotoxicological studies: An overview of current needs and approaches.
    Moermond C; Beasley A; Breton R; Junghans M; Laskowski R; Solomon K; Zahner H
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):640-651. PubMed ID: 27869364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for shampoos: The basis for comparable life cycle assessment.
    Golsteijn L; Lessard L; Campion JF; Capelli A; D'Enfert V; King H; Kremer J; Krugman M; Orliac H; Furnemont SR; Schuh W; Stalmans M; O'Hanlon NW; Coroama M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):649-659. PubMed ID: 29870121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making.
    Rudén C; Adams J; Ågerstrand M; Brock TC; Poulsen V; Schlekat CE; Wheeler JR; Henry TR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):652-663. PubMed ID: 27599457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of four calculation methods proposed by the EC for waste hazardous property HP 14 'Ecotoxic'.
    Hennebert P; Humez N; Conche I; Bishop I; Rebischung F
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():24-33. PubMed ID: 26690049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards a proportionality assessment of risk reduction measures aimed at restricting the use of persistent and bioaccumulative substances.
    Oosterhuis F; Brouwer R; Janssen M; Verhoeven J; Luttikhuizen C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 28548694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.