These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28601188)

  • 1. The quality of fixed prosthodontic impressions: An assessment of crown and bridge impressions received at commercial laboratories.
    Rau CT; Olafsson VG; Delgado AJ; Ritter AV; Donovan TE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Sep; 148(9):654-660. PubMed ID: 28601188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the quality of clinical procedures and technical standards of dental laboratories in fixed partial denture therapy.
    Albashaireh ZS; Alnegrish AS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 10635191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges: an assessment of the work received at three commercial dental laboratories. assessing the quality of the impressions of prepared teeth.
    Storey D; Coward TJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Jun; 21(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 23888527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges: an assessment of the work received at three commercial dental laboratories. assessing qualities of impressions that may lead to occlusal discrepancies with indirect restorations.
    Storey D; Coward TJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Mar; 22(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24922994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges received at commercial dental laboratories.
    Winstanley RB; Carrotte PV; Johnson A
    Br Dent J; 1997 Sep; 183(6):209-13. PubMed ID: 9345799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of fixed partial denture impressions.
    Samet N; Shohat M; Livny A; Weiss EI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 16046964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen.
    Al-Odinee NM; Al-Hamzi M; Al-Shami IZ; Madfa A; Al-Kholani AI; Al-Olofi YM
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):304. PubMed ID: 33148226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impressions for crown and bridge work--an investigation and review.
    Carrotte PV; Johnson A; Winstanley RB
    Br Dent J; 1998 Dec 12-26; 185(11-12):580-5. PubMed ID: 9885431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quality of dental casts used in crown and bridgework.
    Alhouri N; McCord JF; Smith PW
    Br Dent J; 2004 Sep; 197(5):261-4; discussion 249. PubMed ID: 15359325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients.
    Beier US; Grunert I; Kulmer S; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 17580459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.
    Larson TD; Nielsen MA; Brackett WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 12131884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crown and bridge impressions--a comparison between the UK and a number of other countries.
    Winstanley RB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1999; 7(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 10865382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of written prescriptions and master impressions for fixed and removable prosthodontics: a comparative study.
    Lynch CD; Allen PF
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jan; 198(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 15716882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impression evaluation and laboratory use for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Litaker MS; George AJ; Durand S; Malekpour S; Marshall DG; Meyerowitz C; Carter L; Gordan VV; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Nov; 148(11):788-796.e4. PubMed ID: 28822536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nontraumatic final impressions for fixed partial dentures.
    Hoffman JM
    J Prosthodont; 1992 Sep; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 1308224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A quadrant tray and bite registration as an alternative to dual-arch impressions for fixed prosthetics: a clinical and dental laboratory technique.
    Hammond BD; Myers ML; Haywood VB
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 22313819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of Impressions and Work Authorizations Submitted by Dental Students Supervised by Prosthodontists and General Dentists.
    Imbery TA; Diaz N; Greenfield K; Janus C; Best AM
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Oct; 80(10):1229-1236. PubMed ID: 27694297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.