334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28601243)
1. Accounting for spatial variation of trabecular anisotropy with subject-specific finite element modeling moderately improves predictions of local subchondral bone stiffness at the proximal tibia.
Nazemi SM; Kalajahi SMH; Cooper DML; Kontulainen SA; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 59():101-108. PubMed ID: 28601243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing finite element predictions of local subchondral bone structural stiffness using neural network-derived density-modulus relationships for proximal tibial subchondral cortical and trabecular bone.
Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Jan; 41():1-8. PubMed ID: 27842233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of local proximal tibial subchondral bone structural stiffness using subject-specific finite element modeling: Effect of selected density-modulus relationship.
Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Aug; 30(7):703-12. PubMed ID: 26024555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Separate modeling of cortical and trabecular bone offers little improvement in FE predictions of local structural stiffness at the proximal tibia.
Hosseini Kalajahi SM; Nazemi SM; Johnston JD
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Dec; 22(16):1258-1268. PubMed ID: 31509022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying trabecular bone material anisotropy and orientation using low resolution clinical CT images: A feasibility study.
Nazemi SM; Cooper DM; Johnston JD
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Sep; 38(9):978-87. PubMed ID: 27372175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual and combined effects of OA-related subchondral bone alterations on proximal tibial surface stiffness: a parametric finite element modeling study.
Amini M; Nazemi SM; Lanovaz JL; Kontulainen S; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Szyszkowski W; Johnston JD
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):783-91. PubMed ID: 26074327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An exclusion approach for addressing partial volume artifacts with quantititive computed tomography-based finite element modeling of the proximal tibia.
Kalajahi SMH; Nazemi SM; Johnston JD
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Feb; 76():95-100. PubMed ID: 31870545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy using a database approach.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; Cataldi M; Taddei F; van Rietbergen B
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(14):2356-62. PubMed ID: 23972430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transversely isotropic and isotropic material considerations in determining the mechanical response of geometrically accurate bovine tibia bone.
Yassine RA; Hamade RF
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Oct; 57(10):2159-2178. PubMed ID: 31377963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone volume fraction and fabric anisotropy are better determinants of trabecular bone stiffness than other morphological variables.
Maquer G; Musy SN; Wandel J; Gross T; Zysset PK
J Bone Miner Res; 2015 Jun; 30(6):1000-8. PubMed ID: 25529534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fabric-elasticity relationships of tibial trabecular bone are similar in osteogenesis imperfecta and healthy individuals.
Simon M; Indermaur M; Schenk D; Hosseinitabatabaei S; Willie BM; Zysset P
Bone; 2022 Feb; 155():116282. PubMed ID: 34896360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. QCT-FE modeling of the proximal tibia: Effect of mapping strategy on convergence time and model accuracy.
Ashjaee N; Kalajahi SMH; Johnston JD
Med Eng Phys; 2021 Feb; 88():41-46. PubMed ID: 33485512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterising variability and regional correlations of microstructure and mechanical competence of human tibial trabecular bone: An in-vivo HR-pQCT study.
Du J; Brooke-Wavell K; Paggiosi MA; Hartley C; Walsh JS; Silberschmidt VV; Li S
Bone; 2019 Apr; 121():139-148. PubMed ID: 30658093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Not only stiffness, but also yield strength of the trabecular structure determined by non-linear µFE is best predicted by bone volume fraction and fabric tensor.
Musy SN; Maquer G; Panyasantisuk J; Wandel J; Zysset PK
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():808-813. PubMed ID: 27788473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated segmentation of cortical and trabecular bone to generate finite element models for femoral bone mechanics.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Venäläinen MS; Matikka H; Zheng Y; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Aug; 70():19-28. PubMed ID: 31280927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy from stress tensors.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jan; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24777672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simplified boundary conditions alter cortical-trabecular load sharing at the distal radius; A multiscale finite element analysis.
Johnson JE; Troy KL
J Biomech; 2018 Jan; 66():180-185. PubMed ID: 29137724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping anisotropy of the proximal femur for enhanced image based finite element analysis.
Enns-Bray WS; Owoc JS; Nishiyama KK; Boyd SK
J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3272-8. PubMed ID: 25219361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of apparent trabecular bone stiffness through fourth-order fabric tensors.
Moreno R; Smedby Ö; Pahr DH
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Aug; 15(4):831-44. PubMed ID: 26341838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur.
Wirtz DC; Pandorf T; Portheine F; Radermacher K; Schiffers N; Prescher A; Weichert D; Niethard FU
J Biomech; 2003 Feb; 36(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 12547369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
