140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28601561)
21. Prospective Study of the Impact of Liver Biopsy Core Size on Specimen Adequacy and Procedural Complications.
Tublin ME; Blair R; Martin J; Malik S; Ruppert K; Demetris A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):183-188. PubMed ID: 29091001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques.
Schulman AR; Thompson CC; Odze R; Chan WW; Ryou M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Feb; 85(2):419-426. PubMed ID: 27530070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Transrectal ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate. A comparison between the standard 1.2-mm needle and three thinner needles.
Norberg M; Busch C; Stavinoha J; Scardino PT; Magnusson A
Acta Radiol; 1994 Sep; 35(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 8086255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Novella G; Cerruto MA; Galfano A; Novara G; Pea M; Artibani W
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 16448740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system.
Bax J; Cool D; Gardi L; Knight K; Smith D; Montreuil J; Sherebrin S; Romagnoli C; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5397-410. PubMed ID: 19175099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.
Tewes S; Hueper K; Hartung D; Imkamp F; Herrmann TR; Weidemann J; Renckly S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Peters I
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1707-14. PubMed ID: 25774003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. EUS-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal disease: a comparison of diagnostic yield between two core biopsy needles.
Sey MS; Al-Haddad M; Imperiale TF; McGreevy K; Lin J; DeWitt JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Feb; 83(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 26278654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Image visibility of cancer to enhance targeting precision and spatial mapping biopsy for focal therapy of prostate cancer.
Ukimura O; de Castro Abreu AL; Gill IS; Shoji S; Hung AJ; Bahn D
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(8):E354-64. PubMed ID: 23714647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Extensive biopsy using a combined transperineal and transrectal approach to improve prostate cancer detection.
Watanabe M; Hayashi T; Tsushima T; Irie S; Kaneshige T; Kumon H
Int J Urol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):959-63. PubMed ID: 16351651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Temporal-based needle segmentation algorithm for transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy procedures.
Cool DW; Gardi L; Romagnoli C; Saikaly M; Izawa JI; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1660-73. PubMed ID: 20443487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantification of prostate deformation due to needle insertion during TRUS-guided biopsy: comparison of hand-held and mechanically stabilized systems.
De Silva T; Fenster A; Bax J; Romagnoli C; Izawa J; Samarabandu J; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 21520885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Partial Prostatectomy: A Real-time Image-guided Focal Extirpative Feasibility Study.
Abdul-Muhsin HM; Jakob NJ; Kawashima A; Silva AC; Stanton ML; Moshero G; Castle EP; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR
Urology; 2017 Sep; 107():262-266. PubMed ID: 28551173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Quentin M; Hiester A; Blondin D; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
World J Urol; 2016 Feb; 34(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 26055645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Imaging of implant needles for real-time HDR-brachytherapy prostate treatment using biplane ultrasound transducers.
Siebert FA; Hirt M; Niehoff P; Kovács G
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3406-12. PubMed ID: 19746773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of prostate tumor targeting strategies using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy.
Martin PR; Cool DW; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1018-1028. PubMed ID: 29363762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison Between a Combined Transrectal and Transperineal Approach and a Transrectal Approach for Prostate Rebiopsy.
Shida Y; Hakariya T; Takehara K; Onita T; Miyata Y; Sakai H
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4685-90. PubMed ID: 27630313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Significance of routine transition zone biopsies in Japanese men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Muramaki M; Yamanak K; Hara I
Int J Urol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):964-8. PubMed ID: 16351652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: a needle placement accuracy study.
Blumenfeld P; Hata N; DiMaio S; Zou K; Haker S; Fichtinger G; Tempany CM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):688-94. PubMed ID: 17729363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate biopsy quality is independent of needle size: a randomized single-center prospective study.
Cicione A; Cantiello F; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Damiano R
Urol Int; 2012; 89(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 22738882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. First report of robot-assisted transperineal fusion versus off-target biopsy in patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann S; Mischinger J; Amend B; Rausch S; Adam M; Scharpf M; Fend F; Kramer U; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kruck S
World J Urol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 27847972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
