152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28601710)
1. Evolution of word meanings through metaphorical mapping: Systematicity over the past millennium.
Xu Y; Malt BC; Srinivasan M
Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():41-53. PubMed ID: 28601710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Algorithms in the historical emergence of word senses.
Ramiro C; Srinivasan M; Malt BC; Xu Y
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(10):2323-2328. PubMed ID: 29463738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
Li J; Joanisse MF
Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Mental Representation of Polysemy across Word Classes.
Lopukhina A; Laurinavichyute A; Lopukhin K; Dragoy O
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():192. PubMed ID: 29515502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How arbitrary is language?
Monaghan P; Shillcock RC; Christiansen MH; Kirby S
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2014 Sep; 369(1651):20130299. PubMed ID: 25092667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.
Klepousniotou E; Titone D; Romero C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implicit learning of mappings between forms and metaphorical meanings.
Li F; Guo X; Zhu L; Yang Z; Dienes Z
Conscious Cogn; 2013 Mar; 22(1):174-83. PubMed ID: 23313936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses.
Durkin K; Manning J
J Psycholinguist Res; 1989 Nov; 18(6):577-612. PubMed ID: 2632800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not just form, not just meaning: Words with consistent form-meaning mappings are learned earlier.
Cassani G; Limacher N
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1464-1482. PubMed ID: 34609218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How Polysemy Affects Concreteness Ratings: The Case of Metaphor.
Reijnierse WG; Burgers C; Bolognesi M; Krennmayr T
Cogn Sci; 2019 Aug; 43(8):e12779. PubMed ID: 31446656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the roles of form systematicity and sensorimotor effects in language processing.
de Zubicaray GI; Arciuli J; Kearney E; Guenther F; McMahon KL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):431-444. PubMed ID: 36548090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Language and cultural influences in the description of pain.
Fabrega H; Tyma S
Br J Med Psychol; 1976 Dec; 49(4):349-71. PubMed ID: 990209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wordform Similarity Increases With Semantic Similarity: An Analysis of 100 Languages.
Dautriche I; Mahowald K; Gibson E; Piantadosi ST
Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 41(8):2149-2169. PubMed ID: 27862241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metaphors and the mental lexicon.
Geiger O; Ward LM
Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):192-8. PubMed ID: 10433758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local similarity and global variability characterize the semantic space of human languages.
Lewis M; Cahill A; Madnani N; Evans J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Dec; 120(51):e2300986120. PubMed ID: 38079546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metaphor: Meanings and Humanbecoming Metaphorical Truths.
Parse RR
Nurs Sci Q; 2022 Jan; 35(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 34939486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Event-related potential evidence for the early activation of literal meaning during comprehension of conventional lexical metaphors.
Lu A; Zhang JX
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1730-8. PubMed ID: 22561889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Representing the World in Language and Thought.
Malt BC
Top Cogn Sci; 2024 Jan; 16(1):6-24. PubMed ID: 38180992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conceptual relations predict colexification across languages.
Xu Y; Duong K; Malt BC; Jiang S; Srinivasan M
Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104280. PubMed ID: 32442799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
