924 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28602128)
1. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.
Healy EW; Delfarah M; Vasko JL; Carter BL; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4230. PubMed ID: 28618817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
Alexander JM; Rallapalli V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.
Gregan MJ; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
