These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28602138)
1. Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Tests Against the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for 6 Common Foot and Ankle Pathologies. Koltsov JCB; Greenfield ST; Soukup D; Do HT; Ellis SJ Foot Ankle Int; 2017 Aug; 38(8):870-878. PubMed ID: 28602138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Translation and validation of the German version of the foot and ankle outcome score. van Bergen CJ; Sierevelt IN; Hoogervorst P; Waizy H; van Dijk CN; Becher C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jul; 134(7):897-901. PubMed ID: 24748232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle. Angthong C Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Lüring C; König D; Bouillon B Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jun; 25(3):361-365. PubMed ID: 30321978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle. Azam MT; Yu K; Butler J; Do H; Ellis SJ; Kennedy JG; Walls R Foot Ankle Int; 2023 Aug; 44(8):745-753. PubMed ID: 37269134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of PROMIS ® Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Hung M; Baumhauer JF; Latt LD; Saltzman CL; SooHoo NF; Hunt KJ; Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3466-74. PubMed ID: 23749433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Mani SB; Brown HC; Nair P; Chen L; Do HT; Lyman S; Deland JT; Ellis SJ Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Aug; 34(8):1140-6. PubMed ID: 23513031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New paradigm for patient-reported outcomes assessment in foot & ankle research: computerized adaptive testing. Hung M; Nickisch F; Beals TC; Greene T; Clegg DO; Saltzman CL Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Aug; 33(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 22995227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Ringendahl H; Bouillon B; Eysel P; König D Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Dec; 24(6):481-485. PubMed ID: 29409194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychometric properties of foot function index in Urdu-speaking population with ankle and foot disorders. Anjum A; Tauqeer S; Arooj A; Javed H; Shakeel H; Ikram A BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Sep; 25(1):751. PubMed ID: 39300395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Bouillon B; Lüring C; König D BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 29017475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran. Negahban H; Mazaheri M; Salavati M; Sohani SM; Askari M; Fanian H; Parnianpour M Clin Rheumatol; 2010 May; 29(5):479-86. PubMed ID: 20140474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Lee KM; Chung CY; Kwon SS; Sung KH; Lee SY; Won SH; Lee DJ; Lee SC; Park MS Clin Rheumatol; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1443-50. PubMed ID: 23703359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are current foot- and ankle outcome measures appropriate for the evaluation of treatment for osteoarthritis of the ankle?: Evaluation of ceiling effects in foot- and ankle outcome measures. Veltman ES; Hofstad CJ; Witteveen AGH Foot Ankle Surg; 2017 Sep; 23(3):168-172. PubMed ID: 28865585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Prospective, Psychometric Validation of National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Testing in Cervical Spine Patients: Successes and Key Limitations. Iyer S; Koltsov JCB; Steinhaus M; Ross T; Stein D; Yang J; LaFage V; Albert T; Kim HJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Nov; 44(22):1539-1549. PubMed ID: 31689249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of five foot and ankle specific electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) instruments in patients undergoing elective orthopedic foot or ankle surgery. Uimonen MM; Ponkilainen VT; Toom A; Miettinen M; Häkkinen AH; Sandelin H; Latvala AO; Sirola T; Sampo M; Roine RP; Lindahl J; Ilves O; Sandbacka A; Repo JP Foot Ankle Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 32111516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients. Stephan A; Mainzer J; Kümmel D; Impellizzeri FM Qual Life Res; 2019 Oct; 28(10):2821-2829. PubMed ID: 31177411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Karatepe AG; Günaydin R; Kaya T; Karlibaş U; Özbek G Rheumatol Int; 2009 Dec; 30(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 19370349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for Use in Infracalcaneal Heel Pain. Joshi A; Collazo C; Laidley Z; Klein EE; Weil L; Sorensen MD; Fleischer AE J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023; 62(3):501-504. PubMed ID: 36646619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]