BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28602621)

  • 1. Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction.
    Otsubo Y; Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():118-124. PubMed ID: 28602621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
    Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
    J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization?
    Patlewicz G; Casati S; Basketter DA; Asturiol D; Roberts DW; Lepoittevin JP; Worth AP; Aschberger K
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():147-155. PubMed ID: 27569201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.
    Hirota M; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Takenouchi O; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1333-47. PubMed ID: 25824844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of Spectro-DPRA, KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT to estimation of the skin sensitization potential of cosmetics ingredients.
    Cho SA; Choi M; Park SR; An S; Park JH
    J Appl Toxicol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):300-312. PubMed ID: 31680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Takenouchi O; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1318-32. PubMed ID: 25820183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Nukada Y; Miyazawa M; Kazutoshi S; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Mar; 27(2):609-18. PubMed ID: 23149339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison and validation of an in vitro skin sensitization strategy using a data set of 33 chemical references.
    Clouet E; Kerdine-Römer S; Ferret PJ
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Dec; 45(Pt 3):374-385. PubMed ID: 28539215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.
    Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.
    Strickland J; Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Allen D; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Kleinstreuer N
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 27480324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of dermal sensitization potential for industrial or agricultural chemicals with EpiSensA.
    Mizumachi H; LeBaron MJ; Settivari RS; Miyazawa M; Marty MS; Sakaguchi H
    J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):915-927. PubMed ID: 33124094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an artificial neural network model for risk assessment of skin sensitization using human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens™ and in silico structure alert parameter.
    Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Kouzuki H
    J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Apr; 38(4):514-526. PubMed ID: 29226339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods.
    Urbisch D; Mehling A; Guth K; Ramirez T; Honarvar N; Kolle S; Landsiedel R; Jaworska J; Kern PS; Gerberick F; Natsch A; Emter R; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Sakaguchi H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):337-51. PubMed ID: 25541156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconstructed human epidermis-based testing strategy of skin sensitization potential and potency classification using epidermal sensitization assay and in silico data.
    Mizumachi H; Suzuki S; Sakuma M; Natsui M; Imai N; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 44(3):415-427. PubMed ID: 37846211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of eight unsaturated and one saturated lipid compounds.
    Kreiling R; Gehrke H; Broschard TH; Dreeßen B; Eigler D; Hart D; Höpflinger V; Kleber M; Kupny J; Li Q; Ungeheuer P; Sauer UG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():262-276. PubMed ID: 28958912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of KeratinoSens
    Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Otsubo Y; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H
    J Toxicol Sci; 2019; 44(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 30626776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of in vitro assays for the assessment of the skin sensitization hazard of functional polysiloxanes and silanes.
    Petry T; Bosch A; Coste X; Eigler D; Germain P; Seidel S; Jean PA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Mar; 84():64-76. PubMed ID: 28017767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of skin sensitization induced by four ionic liquids.
    Frawley RP; Germolec DR; Johnson VJ; Gulledge T; Manheng W; White K; Shockley KR; Harris SF; Hooth M; Ryan K
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Mar; 42(3):392-408. PubMed ID: 34453447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is a combination of assays really needed for non-animal prediction of skin sensitization potential? Performance of the GARD™ (Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection) assay in comparison with OECD guideline assays alone and in combination.
    Roberts DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Oct; 98():155-160. PubMed ID: 30048705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applicability of an Integrated Testing Strategy consisting of in silico, in chemico and in vitro assays for evaluating the skin sensitization potencies of isocyanates.
    Ohtake T; Maeda Y; Hayashi T; Yamanaka H; Nakai M; Takeyoshi M
    Toxicology; 2018 Jan; 393():9-14. PubMed ID: 29100879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.