These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28602641)

  • 1. A novel flexible capacitive load sensor for use in a mobile unicompartmental knee replacement bearing: An in vitro proof of concept study.
    Mentink MJA; Van Duren BH; Murray DW; Gill HS
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():44-53. PubMed ID: 28602641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The wear of fixed and mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements.
    Brockett CL; Jennings LM; Fisher J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 May; 225(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 21755780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proximal tibial strain in medial unicompartmental knee replacements: A biomechanical study of implant design.
    Scott CE; Eaton MJ; Nutton RW; Wade FA; Pankaj P; Evans SL
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1339-47. PubMed ID: 24078529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of limb alignment on mediolateral loading in total knee replacement: in vivo measurements in five patients.
    Halder A; Kutzner I; Graichen F; Heinlein B; Beier A; Bergmann G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(11):1023-9. PubMed ID: 22637208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: fixed vs mobile bearing.
    Bonutti PM; Dethmers DA
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7 Suppl):24-7. PubMed ID: 18922370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo knee loading characteristics during activities of daily living as measured by an instrumented total knee replacement.
    Mündermann A; Dyrby CO; D'Lima DD; Colwell CW; Andriacchi TP
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Sep; 26(9):1167-72. PubMed ID: 18404700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: the Oxford experience.
    Hurst JM; Berend KR
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 46(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 25435040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metal backing significantly decreases tibial strains in a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty model.
    Small SR; Berend ME; Ritter MA; Buckley CA; Rogge RD
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):777-82. PubMed ID: 20870385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems: a knee simulator study.
    Kretzer JP; Jakubowitz E; Reinders J; Lietz E; Moradi B; Hofmann K; Sonntag R
    Acta Biomater; 2011 Feb; 7(2):710-5. PubMed ID: 20883831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incarceration of a dislocated mobile bearing to the popliteal fossa after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Jeong JH; Kang H; Ha YC; Jang EC
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):323.e5-7. PubMed ID: 21497482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface stress: a factor influencing ultra high molecular weight polyethylene durability in mobile-bearing knee design.
    Morra EA; Heim CS; Greenwald AS
    Orthopedics; 2007 May; 30(5 Suppl):35-8. PubMed ID: 17549865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enclosed electronic system for force measurements in knee implants.
    Forchelet D; Simoncini M; Arami A; Bertsch A; Meurville E; Aminian K; Ryser P; Renaud P
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Aug; 14(8):15009-21. PubMed ID: 25196007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mobile or fixed unicompartmental knee prostheses? In-vitro wear assessments to solve this dilemma.
    Taddei P; Modena E; Grupp TM; Affatato S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1936-46. PubMed ID: 22098892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo medial and lateral tibial loads during dynamic and high flexion activities.
    Zhao D; Banks SA; D'Lima DD; Colwell CW; Fregly BJ
    J Orthop Res; 2007 May; 25(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 17290383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mobile- versus fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Scott RD
    Instr Course Lect; 2010; 59():57-60. PubMed ID: 20415367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biotribology of alternative bearing materials for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Grupp TM; Utzschneider S; Schröder C; Schwiesau J; Fritz B; Maas A; Blömer W; Jansson V
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Sep; 6(9):3601-10. PubMed ID: 20371387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of loading conditions and material properties to stress shielding near the tibial component of total knee replacements.
    Au AG; James Raso V; Liggins AB; Amirfazli A
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(6):1410-6. PubMed ID: 16846605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-powered instrumented knee implant for early detection of postoperative complications.
    Almouahed S; Gouriou M; Hamitouche C; Stindel E; Roux C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():5121-4. PubMed ID: 21095807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study.
    Gleeson RE; Evans R; Ackroyd CE; Webb J; Newman JH
    Knee; 2004 Oct; 11(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 15351413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unicompartmental mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty.
    Emerson RH
    Instr Course Lect; 2005; 54():221-4. PubMed ID: 15948449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.