These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28603009)

  • 1. Graphic report of the results from propensity score method analyses.
    Shrier I; Pang M; Platt RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():154-159. PubMed ID: 28603009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contour plot assessment of existing meta-analyses confirms robust association of statin use and acute kidney injury risk.
    Chevance A; Schuster T; Steele R; Ternès N; Platt RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 68(10):1138-43. PubMed ID: 26092287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of alternative approaches to trim subjects in the tails of the propensity score distribution.
    Glynn RJ; Lunt M; Rothman KJ; Poole C; Schneeweiss S; Stürmer T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Oct; 28(10):1290-1298. PubMed ID: 31385394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Graphical augmentations to the funnel plot assess the impact of additional evidence on a meta-analysis.
    Langan D; Higgins JP; Gregory W; Sutton AJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 22342263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review.
    Austin PC
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2008 Sep; 1(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 20031790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched propensity score analyses.
    Kuss O
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 23972521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching.
    Baser O
    Value Health; 2006; 9(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 17076868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.
    Austin PC; Mamdani MM
    Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2084-106. PubMed ID: 16220490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2037-49. PubMed ID: 18038446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multinomial Extension of Propensity Score Trimming Methods: A Simulation Study.
    Yoshida K; Solomon DH; Haneuse S; Kim SC; Patorno E; Tedeschi SK; Lyu H; Franklin JM; Stürmer T; Hernández-Díaz S; Glynn RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 188(3):609-616. PubMed ID: 30517602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding your way out of the forest without a trail of bread crumbs: development and evaluation of two novel displays of forest plots.
    Schild AH; Voracek M
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26035471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Graphics and Statistics for Cardiology: Data visualisation for meta-analysis.
    Kiran A; Crespillo AP; Rahimi K
    Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 27810865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of propensity score technique to account for exposure-related covariates: an example and lesson.
    Seeger JD; Kurth T; Walker AM
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S143-8. PubMed ID: 17909373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critical review of graphics for subgroup analyses in clinical trials.
    Ballarini NM; Chiu YD; König F; Posch M; Jaki T
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 19(5):541-560. PubMed ID: 32216035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The concept of the marginally matched subject in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Austin PC; Lee DS
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Jun; 18(6):469-82. PubMed ID: 19319923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures.
    Jones M; Dobson A; O'Brian S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 40(5):1308-13. PubMed ID: 21737402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Presenting simulation results in a nested loop plot.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():129. PubMed ID: 25495636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association Between Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Center Volume and Mortality Among Children With Heart Disease: Propensity and Risk Modeling.
    Gupta P; Rettiganti M
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2015 Nov; 16(9):868-74. PubMed ID: 26536546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the acute care surgery literature: avoiding the pitfalls and proposing a set of reporting guidelines.
    Zakrison TL; Austin PC; McCredie VA
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 28342097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.