These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28604507)
1. Visits to Registered Nurses: An Opportunity to Increase Contraceptive Access in California. Parker EC; Kong K; Watts LA; Schwarz EB; Darney PD; Thiel de Bocanegra H Nurs Res; 2017; 66(4):286-294. PubMed ID: 28604507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meeting the reproductive health care needs of adolescents: California's Family Planning Access, Care, and Treatment Program. Brindis CD; Llewelyn L; Marie K; Blum M; Biggs A; Maternowska C J Adolesc Health; 2003 Jun; 32(6 Suppl):79-90. PubMed ID: 12782446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The nurse practitioner in family planning services: law and practice. Roemer R Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Jun; 6(3):28-34. PubMed ID: 12259979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the fertility effect of expansions of publicly funded family planning services in California. Foster DG; Biggs MA; Rostovtseva D; de Bocanegra HT; Darney PD; Brindis CD Womens Health Issues; 2011; 21(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 21802962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized Controlled Trial of Home-Based Hormonal Contraceptive Dispensing for Women At Risk of Unintended Pregnancy. Melnick AL; Rdesinski RE; Marino M; Jacob-Files E; Gipson T; Kuyl M; Dexter E; Olds D Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2016 Jun; 48(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 27196986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should Home-Based Contraceptive Dispensing become a Routine part of Public Health Nurse Practice? Review of Nurse Perceptions. Jacob-Files E; Rdesinski R; Storey M; Gipson T; Cohen DJ; Olds D; Melnick A Public Health Nurs; 2015; 32(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25196399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics associated with contraceptive use among adolescent females in school-based family planning programs. Brindis C; Starbuck-Morales S; Wolfe AL; McCarter V Fam Plann Perspect; 1994; 26(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 7957817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimates of pregnancies averted through California's family planning waiver program in 2002. Foster DG; Biggs MA; Amaral G; Brindis C; Navarro S; Bradsberry M; Stewart F Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2006 Sep; 38(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 16963385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Next step for Egypt -- access to more methods. Herndon N Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Mar; 13(3):18-21. PubMed ID: 12318096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of nurse home visits, including provision of 3 months of contraceptives and contraceptive counseling, on perceived barriers to contraceptive use and contraceptive use self-efficacy. Melnick AL; Rdesinski RE; Creach ED; Choi D; Harvey SM Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(6):471-81. PubMed ID: 18926726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expanded state-funded family planning services: estimating pregnancies averted by the Family PACT Program in California, 1997-1998. Foster DG; Klaisle CM; Blum M; Bradsberry ME; Brindis CD; Stewart FH Am J Public Health; 2004 Aug; 94(8):1341-6. PubMed ID: 15284041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterizing pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception services and users in California and Oregon pharmacies. Lu S; Rafie S; Hamper J; Strauss R; Kroon L Contraception; 2019 Apr; 99(4):239-243. PubMed ID: 30562478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpregnancy intervals: impact of postpartum contraceptive effectiveness and coverage. Thiel de Bocanegra H; Chang R; Howell M; Darney P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 210(4):311.e1-311.e8. PubMed ID: 24334205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scope of family planning services available in Federally Qualified Health Centers. Wood S; Beeson T; Bruen B; Goldberg DG; Mead H; Shin P; Rosenbaum S Contraception; 2014 Feb; 89(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 24176250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program. Foster DG; Rostovtseva DP; Brindis CD; Biggs MA; Hulett D; Darney PD Am J Public Health; 2009 Mar; 99(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 18703437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Swedish midwives--a case of professional domination of family planning provision by women. Sundstrom-feigenberg K IPPF Eur Reg Inf; 1984 Apr; 13(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 12178365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New IPPF statement on breastfeeding, fertility and post-partum contraception. International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP IPPF Med Bull; 1990 Apr; 24(2):2-4. PubMed ID: 12316285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Don't be scared. Killick S Audit Unit News; 1996 Jan; 1(4):1. PubMed ID: 12346947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postpartum care and contraception provided to women with gestational and preconception diabetes in California's Medicaid program. Schwarz EB; Braughton MY; Riedel JC; Cohen S; Logan J; Howell M; Thiel de Bocanegra H Contraception; 2017 Dec; 96(6):432-438. PubMed ID: 28844877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A data extraction algorithm for assessment of contraceptive counseling and provision. Roser BJ; Rubin SE; Nagarajan N; Wieland DL; Benfield NC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 218(3):333.e1-333.e5. PubMed ID: 29175248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]