These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28604902)

  • 21. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modelling the toxicity of a large set of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles using the OCHEM platform.
    Kovalishyn V; Abramenko N; Kopernyk I; Charochkina L; Metelytsia L; Tetko IV; Peijnenburg W; Kustov L
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():507-517. PubMed ID: 28802948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mapping the dawn of nanoecotoxicological research.
    Kahru A; Ivask A
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):823-33. PubMed ID: 23148404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CompNanoTox2015: novel perspectives from a European conference on computational nanotoxicology on predictive nanotoxicology.
    Bañares MA; Haase A; Tran L; Lobaskin V; Oberdörster G; Rallo R; Leszczynski J; Hoet P; Korenstein R; Hardy B; Puzyn T
    Nanotoxicology; 2017 Sep; 11(7):839-845. PubMed ID: 28885075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Current situation on the availability of nanostructure-biological activity data.
    Oksel C; Ma CY; Wang XZ
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(2):79-94. PubMed ID: 25608859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Evaluation of biological influence of nano-materials using toxicokinetic and toxicoproteomic approach].
    Yoshikawa T; Nabeshi H; Yoshioka Y
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1715-25. PubMed ID: 19043290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. From basic physics to mechanisms of toxicity: the "liquid drop" approach applied to develop predictive classification models for toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles.
    Sizochenko N; Rasulev B; Gajewicz A; Kuz'min V; Puzyn T; Leszczynski J
    Nanoscale; 2014 Nov; 6(22):13986-93. PubMed ID: 25317542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring possible mechanisms of action for the nanotoxicity and protein binding of decorated nanotubes: interpretation of physicochemical properties from optimal QSAR models.
    Esposito EX; Hopfinger AJ; Shao CY; Su BH; Chen SZ; Tseng YJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Oct; 288(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 26200234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Linking nanomaterial properties to biological outcomes: analytical chemistry challenges in nanotoxicology for the next decade.
    Qiu TA; Clement PL; Haynes CL
    Chem Commun (Camb); 2018 Nov; 54(91):12787-12803. PubMed ID: 30357136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nano-quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling using easily computable and interpretable descriptors for uptake of magnetofluorescent engineered nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells.
    Kar S; Gajewicz A; Puzyn T; Roy K
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Jun; 28(4):600-6. PubMed ID: 24412539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proteomic approach to nanotoxicity.
    Matysiak M; Kapka-Skrzypczak L; Brzóska K; Gutleb AC; Kruszewski M
    J Proteomics; 2016 Mar; 137():35-44. PubMed ID: 26506535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative Analysis of QSAR-based vs. Chemical Similarity Based Predictors of GPCRs Binding Affinity.
    Luo M; Wang XS; Tropsha A
    Mol Inform; 2016 Jan; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 27491652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
    Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nano(Q)SAR: Challenges, pitfalls and perspectives.
    Tantra R; Oksel C; Puzyn T; Wang J; Robinson KN; Wang XZ; Ma CY; Wilkins T
    Nanotoxicology; 2015; 9(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 25211549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative study of predictive computational models for nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity.
    Sayes C; Ivanov I
    Risk Anal; 2010 Nov; 30(11):1723-34. PubMed ID: 20561263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Towards a nanospecific approach for risk assessment.
    Dekkers S; Oomen AG; Bleeker EA; Vandebriel RJ; Micheletti C; Cabellos J; Janer G; Fuentes N; Vázquez-Campos S; Borges T; Silva MJ; Prina-Mello A; Movia D; Nesslany F; Ribeiro AR; Leite PE; Groenewold M; Cassee FR; Sips AJ; Dijkzeul A; van Teunenbroek T; Wijnhoven SW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():46-59. PubMed ID: 27255696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Promises and pitfalls of quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches for predicting metabolism and toxicity.
    Zvinavashe E; Murk AJ; Rietjens IM
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 21(12):2229-36. PubMed ID: 19548346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computational modeling in nanomedicine: prediction of multiple antibacterial profiles of nanoparticles using a quantitative structure-activity relationship perturbation model.
    Speck-Planche A; Kleandrova VV; Luan F; Cordeiro MN
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2015 Jan; 10(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 25600965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing the reliability of a QSAR model's predictions.
    He L; Jurs PC
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Jun; 23(6):503-23. PubMed ID: 15896992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.