267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28606075)
1. Comparison of the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive and open surgery for octogenarian and older compared to younger gastric cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Liu CA; Huang KH; Chen MH; Lo SS; Li AF; Wu CW; Shyr YM; Fang WL
BMC Surg; 2017 Jun; 17(1):68. PubMed ID: 28606075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older.
Kwon IG; Cho I; Guner A; Kim HI; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2321-30. PubMed ID: 25480603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience.
Greenleaf EK; Sun SX; Hollenbeak CS; Wong J
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Mar; 20(2):368-378. PubMed ID: 26961133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer with liver metastasis: a comparison with open surgery.
Li J; Xi H; Cui J; Zhang K; Gao Y; Liang W; Cai A; Wei B; Chen L
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 29075971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution.
Oh SY; Kwon S; Lee KG; Suh YS; Choe HN; Kong SH; Lee HJ; Kim WH; Yang HK
Surg Endosc; 2014 Mar; 28(3):789-95. PubMed ID: 24263458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy].
Lan X; Xi H; Zhang K; Cui J; Li M; Chen L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):184-189. PubMed ID: 28226353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of robotic and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy to gastric cancer patients with body mass index ≥24 kg/m
Cong T; Liu G; Zhang K; Gao Y; Cui J; Lan X; Teng D; Huo X; Wei B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 21(3):318-324. PubMed ID: 29577221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Hospital Volume on Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer.
Dougherty K; Zhang Z; Montenegro G; Hinyard L; Xu E; Hsueh E; Luu C
Am Surg; 2023 Nov; 89(11):4569-4577. PubMed ID: 35999671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve.
Ahn J; Iqbal A; Manning BT; Leblang S; Bohl DD; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Singh K
Spine J; 2016 Aug; 16(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 26235463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic assisted gastrectomy compared with open resection: a case-matched study.
Caruso R; Vicente E; Quijano Y; Ielpo B; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Ferri V
Updates Surg; 2019 Jun; 71(2):367-373. PubMed ID: 29728921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Fast-track" and "Minimally Invasive" Surgery for Gastric Cancer.
Liu XX; Pan HF; Jiang ZW; Zhang S; Wang ZM; Chen P; Zhao Y; Wang G; Zhao K; Li JS
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(19):2294-300. PubMed ID: 27647187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic ureteroneocystotomy for benign and malignant ureteral lesions: a comparison of over 100 minimally invasive cases.
Elsamra SE; Theckumparampil N; Garden B; Alom M; Waingankar N; Leavitt DA; Kreshover J; Schwartz M; Kavoussi LR; Richstone L
J Endourol; 2014 Dec; 28(12):1455-9. PubMed ID: 25390972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
