These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28606159)

  • 1. Thresholds for Oxford Knee Score after total knee replacement surgery: a novel approach to post-operative evaluation.
    Petersen CL; Kjærsgaard JB; Kjærgaard N; Jensen MU; Laursen MB
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 12(1):89. PubMed ID: 28606159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thresholds for the Oxford Hip Score after total hip replacement surgery: a novel approach to postoperative evaluation.
    Kjærgaard N; Kjærsgaard JB; Petersen CL; Jensen MU; Laursen MB
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2017 Dec; 18(4):401-406. PubMed ID: 28685345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling.
    Price A; Smith J; Dakin H; Kang S; Eibich P; Cook J; Gray A; Harris K; Middleton R; Gibbons E; Benedetto E; Smith S; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Sayers A; Miller L; Marques E; Gooberman-Hill R; Blom A; Judge A; Arden N; Murray D; Glyn-Jones S; Barker K; Carr A; Beard D
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(32):1-216. PubMed ID: 31287051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): thresholds for the EQ-5D-5L and Oxford hip and knee scores for patients with total hip and knee replacement.
    Conner-Spady BL; Marshall DA; Bohm E; Dunbar MJ; Loucks L; Noseworthy TW
    Qual Life Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):519-530. PubMed ID: 36367656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing patients for joint replacement: can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection?
    Judge A; Arden NK; Price A; Glyn-Jones S; Beard D; Carr AJ; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Dec; 93(12):1660-4. PubMed ID: 22161930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Ackerman IN; Harris IA; Cashman K; Rowden N; Lorimer M; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 35901436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Associations between preoperative Oxford hip and knee scores and costs and quality of life of patients undergoing primary total joint replacement in the NHS England: an observational study.
    Eibich P; Dakin HA; Price AJ; Beard D; Arden NK; Gray AM
    BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e019477. PubMed ID: 29643154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5d poorly predict patient's satisfaction following mechanically aligned total knee replacement: A cross-sectional study.
    Gummaraju A; Maillot C; Baryeh K; Villet L; Rivière C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102867. PubMed ID: 33639287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diabetes does not influence the early outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study assessing the Oxford knee score, short form 12, and patient satisfaction.
    Clement ND; MacDonald D; Burnett R; Breusch SJ
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 23993274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geographical Variation in Outcomes of Primary Hip and Knee Replacement.
    Garriga C; Leal J; Sánchez-Santos MT; Arden N; Price A; Prieto-Alhambra D; Carr A; Rangan A; Cooper C; Peat G; Fitzpatrick R; Barker K; Judge A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Oct; 2(10):e1914325. PubMed ID: 31664449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.
    Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Gerhart CRB; Christopher ZK; Spangehl MJ; Clarke HD; Bingham JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jan; 481(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 36200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient acceptable symptom states after totalhip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up: Thresholds of the Oxford hip and knee scores.
    Keurentjes JC; Van Tol FR; Fiocco M; So-Osman C; Onstenk R; Koopman-Van Gemert AW; Pöll RG; Nelissen RG
    Bone Joint Res; 2014; 3(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 24421318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Desired Oxford Knee Score Obtained Before Total Knee Arthroplasty is Predictive of the Postoperative Oxford Knee Score: A Prospective Study.
    Nedopil AJ; Greidanus NV; Garbuz DS; Howard LC; Sayre EC; Masri BA
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 35940354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The oxford knee score minimal clinically important difference for revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Khow YZ; Liow MHL; Goh GS; Chen JY; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
    Knee; 2021 Oct; 32():211-217. PubMed ID: 34509827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting patient satisfaction using the Oxford knee score: where do we draw the line?
    Clement ND; Macdonald D; Burnett R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 May; 133(5):689-94. PubMed ID: 23525559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?
    Ingelsrud LH; Wilkinson JM; Overgaard S; Rolfson O; Hallstrom B; Navarro RA; Terner M; Karmakar-Hore S; Webster G; Slawomirski L; Sayers A; Kendir C; de Bienassis K; Klazinga N; Dahl AW; Bohm E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1884-1896. PubMed ID: 35901444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The verbal Oxford Knee Score is not clinically different from the written score when assessed before or after total knee arthroplasty.
    Makaram N; Lee T; Macdonald D; Clement ND
    Knee; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1396-1405. PubMed ID: 33010753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Translation and validation of the 12-item Oxford knee score for use in Finland.
    Reito A; Järvistö A; Jämsen E; Skyttä E; Remes V; Huhtala H; Niemeläinen M; Eskelinen A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Feb; 18(1):74. PubMed ID: 28178956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery.
    Judge A; Arden NK; Kiran A; Price A; Javaid MK; Beard D; Murray D; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22371552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement.
    Ingelsrud LH; Roos EM; Terluin B; Gromov K; Husted H; Troelsen A
    Acta Orthop; 2018 Oct; 89(5):541-547. PubMed ID: 29860936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.