129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28606159)
21. Assessing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, the Oxford Hip Score, and the Oxford Knee Score in the NHS patient-reported outcome measures.
Kang S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 16(1):18. PubMed ID: 33413483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. PROMs in total knee replacement: analysis of negative outcomes.
Begum F; Panagiotidou A; Park C; Ashdown T; El-Tawil S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2021 Jan; 103(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 32829644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Oxford knee score 1 year after TKR for osteoarthritis with reference to a normative population: What can patients expect?
Yap YYW; Edwards KL; Soutakbar H; Fernandes GS; Scammell BE
Osteoarthr Cartil Open; 2021 Jun; 3(2):100143. PubMed ID: 36474993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Oxford knee score and its subscales do not exhibit a ceiling or a floor effect in knee arthroplasty patients: an analysis of the National Health Service PROMs data set.
Harris K; Lim CR; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Beard DJ; Price AJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Sep; 25(9):2736-2742. PubMed ID: 26519187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlations between patient-perceived outcome and objectively-measured biomechanical change following Total Knee Replacement.
Biggs PR; Whatling GM; Wilson C; Holt CA
Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():65-70. PubMed ID: 30826689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment Success Following Joint Arthroplasty: Defining Thresholds for the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores.
Hamilton DF; Loth FL; MacDonald DJ; Giesinger K; Patton JT; Simpson AH; Howie CR; Giesinger JM
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2392-2397. PubMed ID: 29691169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England's National PROM collection programme.
Mohammad HR; Judge A; Murray DW
Acta Orthop; 2021 Dec; 92(6):701-708. PubMed ID: 34309481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Defining Clinically Meaningful Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Knee Arthroplasty.
Most J; Hoelen TA; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Schotanus MGM; Boonen B
J Arthroplasty; 2022 May; 37(5):837-844.e3. PubMed ID: 35134515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An analysis of Oxford hip and knee scores following primary hip and knee replacement performed at a specialist centre.
Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Robb CA; Pynsent PB
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jul; 96-B(7):928-35. PubMed ID: 24986947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The patient acceptable symptom state for the knee society score, oxford knee score and short form-36 following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Goh GS; Liow MHL; Chen JY; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Mar; 31(3):1113-1122. PubMed ID: 33912978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Between-hospital and between-surgeon variation in thresholds for hip and knee replacement.
Heath EL; Ackerman IN; Holder C; Lorimer MF; Graves SE; Harris IA
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Sep; 92(9):2229-2234. PubMed ID: 35642256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Crosswalks Between Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Short Forms: HOOS/KOOS JR and Oxford.
Polascik BA; Hidaka C; Thompson MC; Tong-Ngork S; Wagner JL; Plummer O; Lyman S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jun; 102(11):983-990. PubMed ID: 32187121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preoperative Factors Affecting the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Total Knee Replacement: Socioeconomic Factors and Preoperative OKS Have a Clinically Meaningful Effect.
Demetriou C; Webb J; Sedgwick P; Afzal I; Field R; Kader D
J Knee Surg; 2022 Jul; 35(9):940-948. PubMed ID: 33450777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Which Oxford Knee Score level represents a satisfactory symptom state after undergoing a total knee replacement?
Ingelsrud LH; Terluin B; Gromov K; Price A; Beard D; Troelsen A
Acta Orthop; 2021 Feb; 92(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 33047623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Early post-operative oxford knee score and knee society score predict patient satisfaction 2 years after total knee arthroplasty.
Goh GS; Bin Abd Razak HR; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2021 Jan; 141(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 33044708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Tibial component sizing and alignment of TKR components does not significantly affect patient reported outcome measures at six months. A case series of 474 participants.
Ahmed I; Paraoan V; Bhatt D; Mishra B; Khatri C; Griffin D; Metcalfe A; Barlow T
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():67-73. PubMed ID: 29471154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Identification of Potentially High-risk Patients on the Basis of PROMs in a Certified Centre for Joint Replacement (EndoProthetikZentrum) Using the Example of Primary Knee Arthroplasty.
Osmanski-Zenk K; Klinder A; Darowski M; Goosmann M; Mittelmeier W; Ellenrieder M
Z Orthop Unfall; 2023 Dec; 161(6):637-647. PubMed ID: 35378565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Socioeconomic status affects the Oxford knee score and short-form 12 score following total knee replacement.
Clement ND; Jenkins PJ; MacDonald D; Nie YX; Patton JT; Breusch SJ; Howie CR; Biant LC
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jan; 95-B(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 23307673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of a prediction model that allows direct comparison of the Oxford Knee Score and American Knee Society clinical rating system.
Maempel JF; Clement ND; Brenkel IJ; Walmsley PJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Apr; 97-B(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 25820889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements.
Williams DP; Price AJ; Beard DJ; Hadfield SG; Arden NK; Murray DW; Field RE
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jan; 95-B(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 23307671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
