These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28606336)

  • 1. Identification at the crime scene: The sooner, the better? The interpretation of rapid identification information by CSIs at the crime scene.
    de Gruijter M; Nee C; de Poot CJ
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jul; 57(4):296-306. PubMed ID: 28606336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid identification information and its influence on the perceived clues at a crime scene: An experimental study.
    de Gruijter M; Nee C; de Poot CJ
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):421-430. PubMed ID: 29173455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of New Technologies on the Visual Attention of CSIs Performing a Crime Scene Investigation.
    de Gruijter M; de Poot CJ; Elffers H
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 26271385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CSI-CSI: Comparing several investigative approaches toward crime scene improvement.
    Knes AS; de Gruijter M; Zuidberg MC; de Poot CJ
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 38182314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Blood, Bucks and Bias": Reliability and biasability of crime scene investigators' selection and prioritization of blood traces.
    Lidén M; Almazrouei MA
    Sci Justice; 2023 Mar; 63(2):276-293. PubMed ID: 36870706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information.
    van den Eeden CAJ; de Poot CJ; van Koppen PJ
    Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):475-481. PubMed ID: 27914555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Forensic Confirmation Bias: A Comparison Between Experts and Novices.
    van den Eeden CAJ; de Poot CJ; van Koppen PJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):120-126. PubMed ID: 29772072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The added value of behavioural information in crime scene investigations.
    de Roo RHD; de Gruijter M; de Poot CJ; Limborgh JCM; van den Hoven P
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 5():100290. PubMed ID: 36438911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guilty by his fibers: suspect confession versus textile fibers reconstructed simulation.
    Suzuki S; Higashikawa Y; Sugita R; Suzuki Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):e27-32. PubMed ID: 19411148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision support for using mobile Rapid DNA analysis at the crime scene.
    Mapes AA; Stoel RD; de Poot CJ; Vergeer P; Huyck M
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jan; 59(1):29-45. PubMed ID: 30654966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advances in Technologies in Crime Scene Investigation.
    Esposito M; Sessa F; Cocimano G; Zuccarello P; Roccuzzo S; Salerno M
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 37891990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual reality and integrated crime scene scanning for immersive and heterogeneous crime scene reconstruction.
    Wang J; Li Z; Hu W; Shao Y; Wang L; Wu R; Ma K; Zou D; Chen Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Oct; 303():109943. PubMed ID: 31546165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective data on DNA success rates can aid the selection process of crime samples for analysis by rapid mobile DNA technologies.
    Mapes AA; Kloosterman AD; Poot CJ; van Marion V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():28-33. PubMed ID: 27015156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative assessment of similarity between randomly acquired characteristics on high quality exemplars and crime scene impressions via analysis of feature size and shape.
    Richetelli N; Nobel M; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():211-222. PubMed ID: 27838107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigative DNA analysis of two-person mixed crime scene trace in a murder case.
    Ralf A; Kayser M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102557. PubMed ID: 34175530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The polymorphism of crime scene investigation: An exploratory analysis of the influence of crime and forensic intelligence on decisions made by crime scene examiners.
    Resnikoff T; Ribaux O; Baylon A; Jendly M; Rossy Q
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():425-434. PubMed ID: 26583959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part II: Intelligence and crime scene examination.
    Ribaux O; Baylon A; Lock E; Delémont O; Roux C; Zingg C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jun; 199(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 20399047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of body fluids for forensic purposes: from laboratory testing to non-destructive rapid confirmatory identification at a crime scene.
    Virkler K; Lednev IK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Jul; 188(1-3):1-17. PubMed ID: 19328638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.