These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28607763)
1. In vitro evaluation of a new iterative reconstruction algorithm for dose reduction in coronary artery calcium scoring. Gassenmaier T; Allmendinger T; Kunz AS; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Ergün S; Bley TA; Petritsch B Acta Radiol Open; 2017 May; 6(5):2058460117710682. PubMed ID: 28607763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring. Willemink MJ; den Harder AM; Foppen W; Schilham AM; Rienks R; Laufer EM; Nieman K; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Nathoe HM; Leiner T J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26342405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of CT radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction algorithms from four different vendors on coronary calcium scoring. Willemink MJ; Takx RA; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Bleys RL; Das M; Wildberger JE; Prokop M; Buls N; de Mey J; Schilham AM; Leiner T Eur Radiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):2201-12. PubMed ID: 24889996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calibration of coronary calcium scores determined using iterative image reconstruction (AIDR 3D) at 120, 100, and 80 kVp. Blobel J; Mews J; Goatman KA; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1921. PubMed ID: 27036588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols. Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose reduction techniques in coronary calcium scoring: The effect of iterative reconstruction combined with low tube voltage on calcium scores in a thoracic phantom. Vonder M; Pelgrim GJ; Meyer M; Henzler T; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():229-235. PubMed ID: 28668419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients. Tang YC; Liu YC; Hsu MY; Tsai HY; Chen CM Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 29395796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of HU threshold for coronary artery calcium scans reconstructed at 0.5-mm slice thickness using iterative reconstruction. Hou KY; Tsujioka K; Yang CC J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):111-120. PubMed ID: 31889419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction. Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring with tube current reduction by 75%, using an adaptive iterative reconstruction algorithm. Luhur R; Schuijf JD; Mews J; Blobel J; Hamm B; Lembcke A Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170678. PubMed ID: 29260893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating a calcium-aware kernel for CT CAC scoring with varying surrounding materials and heart rates: a dynamic phantom study. van der Werf NR; Booij R; Schmidt B; Flohr TG; Leiner T; de Groen JJ; Bos D; Budde RPJ; Willemink MJ; Greuter MJW Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9211-9220. PubMed ID: 34050386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Quantitative evaluation of calcium (content) in the coronary artery using hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm on low-dose 64-detector CT: comparison of iDose and filtered back projection]. Murazaki H; Funama Y; Hatemura M; Fujioka C; Tomiguchi S Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 21532246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose Reduction in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Mono-Energetic Images from Reduced Tube Voltage Dual-Source Photon-Counting CT Data: A Dynamic Phantom Study. van der Werf NR; van Gent M; Booij R; Bos D; van der Lugt A; Budde RPJ; Greuter MJW; van Straten M Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34943428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Toward a New Standard. van Praagh GD; Wang J; van der Werf NR; Greuter MJW; Mastrodicasa D; Nieman K; van Hamersvelt RW; Oostveen LJ; de Lange F; Slart RHJA; Leiner T; Fleischmann D; Willemink MJ Invest Radiol; 2022 Jan; 57(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 34261083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality. Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms. Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]