These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28608292)

  • 21. Stopping at the sight of food - How gender and obesity impact on response inhibition.
    Mühlberg C; Mathar D; Villringer A; Horstmann A; Neumann J
    Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():663-676. PubMed ID: 27592420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task.
    Enriquez-Geppert S; Konrad C; Pantev C; Huster RJ
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jun; 51(2):877-87. PubMed ID: 20188191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impaired motor inhibition in developmental coordination disorder.
    He JL; Fuelscher I; Coxon J; Barhoun P; Parmar D; Enticott PG; Hyde C
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Nov; 127():23-33. PubMed ID: 30245237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood.
    Eigsti IM; Zayas V; Mischel W; Shoda Y; Ayduk O; Dadlani MB; Davidson MC; Lawrence Aber J; Casey BJ
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jun; 17(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 16771797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of proactive and reactive control in a rewarded stop-signal task.
    Schevernels H; Bombeke K; Van der Borght L; Hopf JM; Krebs RM; Boehler CN
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 121():115-25. PubMed ID: 26188262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proactive modulation of long-interval intracortical inhibition during response inhibition.
    Cowie MJ; MacDonald HJ; Cirillo J; Byblow WD
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):859-67. PubMed ID: 27281744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.
    Best M; Lawrence NS; Logan GD; McLaren IP; Verbruggen F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):115-37. PubMed ID: 26322688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stopping ability in younger and older adults: Behavioral and event-related potential.
    Hsieh S; Lin YC
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 17(2):348-363. PubMed ID: 27896714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 12669750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1695-1716. PubMed ID: 29019064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Stroop Task Sex Difference: Evolved Inhibition or Color Naming?
    Sjoberg EA; Wilner RG; D'Souza A; Cole GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jan; 52(1):315-323. PubMed ID: 36261735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
    Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of emotional context on impulse control.
    Brown MR; Lebel RM; Dolcos F; Wilman AH; Silverstone PH; Pazderka H; Fujiwara E; Wild TC; Carroll AM; Hodlevskyy O; Zedkova L; Zwaigenbaum L; Thompson AH; Greenshaw AJ; Dursun SM
    Neuroimage; 2012 Oct; 63(1):434-46. PubMed ID: 22781161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent.
    Simmonds DJ; Pekar JJ; Mostofsky SH
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):224-32. PubMed ID: 17850833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inferior frontal cortex activity is modulated by reward sensitivity and performance variability.
    Fuentes-Claramonte P; Ávila C; Rodríguez-Pujadas A; Costumero V; Ventura-Campos N; Bustamante JC; Rosell-Negre P; Barrós-Loscertales A
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Feb; 114():127-37. PubMed ID: 26772873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect.
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    Appetite; 2018 May; 124():99-110. PubMed ID: 28442335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities.
    Chikazoe J; Konishi S; Asari T; Jimura K; Miyashita Y
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 17214564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.