These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28608292)

  • 41. Good to be stressed? Improved response inhibition and error processing after acute stress in young and older men.
    Dierolf AM; Schoofs D; Hessas EM; Falkenstein M; Otto T; Paul M; Suchan B; Wolf OT
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():434-447. PubMed ID: 30171874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Response inhibition, preattentive processing, and sex difference in young children: an event-related potential study.
    Liu T; Xiao T; Shi J
    Neuroreport; 2013 Feb; 24(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 23262505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming.
    Mayr S; Buchner A; Dentale S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):408-23. PubMed ID: 19331497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
    Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memorygo/no-go task: Inhibition in young adults.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13065. PubMed ID: 29383725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Complementary roles of cortical oscillations in automatic and controlled processing during rapid serial tasks.
    Isabella S; Ferrari P; Jobst C; Cheyne JA; Cheyne D
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():268-81. PubMed ID: 26049145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Stop checking: Repeated checking and its effects on response inhibition and doubt.
    Linkovski O; Kalanthroff E; Henik A; Anholt GE
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Dec; 53():84-91. PubMed ID: 25666207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Response inhibition of children with ADHD in the stop-signal task: an event-related potential study.
    Senderecka M; Grabowska A; Szewczyk J; Gerc K; Chmylak R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 21641941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Are you able not to react to what you hear? Inhibition behavior measured with an auditory Go/NoGo paradigm.
    Wegmann E; Brand M; Snagowski J; Schiebener J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Feb; 39(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 27410426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Angry but not neutral faces facilitate response inhibition in schizophrenia patients.
    Derntl B; Habel U
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 267(7):621-627. PubMed ID: 27866272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Stop task after-effects: the extent of slowing during the preparation and execution of movement.
    Enticott PG; Bradshaw JL; Bellgrove MA; Upton DJ; Ogloff JR
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 19439396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The key locus of common response inhibition network for no-go and stop signals.
    Zheng D; Oka T; Bokura H; Yamaguchi S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 20(8):1434-42. PubMed ID: 18303978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The control of deliberate waiting strategies in a stop-signal task.
    Sylwan RP
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2004 Jun; 37(6):853-62. PubMed ID: 15264029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Preparing for (valenced) action: The role of differential effort in the orthogonalized go/no-go task.
    Schevernels H; Bombeke K; Krebs RM; Boehler CN
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 26481327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Neural systems mediating decision-making and response inhibition for social and nonsocial stimuli in autism.
    Shafritz KM; Bregman JD; Ikuta T; Szeszko PR
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2015 Jul; 60():112-20. PubMed ID: 25765593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.
    Dutra IC; Waller DA; Wessel JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(6):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29305533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task.
    Boehler CN; Münte TF; Krebs RM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 18440947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accounting for cognitive aging: context processing, inhibition or processing speed?
    Rush BK; Barch DM; Braver TS
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):588-610. PubMed ID: 16887791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.