These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28608364)

  • 21. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement.
    Austin PC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Nov; 134(5):1128-35. PubMed ID: 17976439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A review of the use of propensity score methods with multiple treatment groups in the general internal medicine literature.
    Shurrab M; Ko DT; Jackevicius CA; Tu K; Middleton A; Michael F; Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2023 Aug; 32(8):817-831. PubMed ID: 37144449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Propensity score matching in SPSS].
    Huang F; DU C; Sun M; Ning B; Luo Y; An S
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1597-601. PubMed ID: 26607082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A review of the use of propensity score diagnostics in papers published in high-ranking medical journals.
    Granger E; Watkins T; Sergeant JC; Lunt M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):132. PubMed ID: 32460872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Newsworthiness vs scientific impact: are the most highly cited urology papers the most widely disseminated in the media?
    O'Connor EM; Nason GJ; O'Kelly F; Manecksha RP; Loeb S
    BJU Int; 2017 Sep; 120(3):441-454. PubMed ID: 28418091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Impact of Spanish-language urological publications in periodicals in the English language].
    Pérez Arbej JA; Cameo Rico MI; Arnáiz Esteban F; Martínez Pérez E; Nogueras Gimeno MA; Espuela Orgaz R; Crespo Mayor V
    Arch Esp Urol; 1997 Jun; 50(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 9382584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of propensity scores, disease risk scores, and regression in confounder adjustment for the safety of emerging treatment with group sequential monitoring.
    Xu S; Shetterly S; Cook AJ; Raebel MA; Goonesekera S; Shoaibi A; Roy J; Fireman B
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Apr; 25(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 26875591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical research and statistical methods in the urology literature.
    Scales CD; Norris RD; Peterson BL; Preminger GM; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2005 Oct; 174(4 Pt 1):1374-9. PubMed ID: 16145441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of the propensity score in a covariate-based linkage analysis of the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism.
    Doan BQ; Frangakis CE; Shugart YY; Bailey-Wilson JE
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33. PubMed ID: 16451643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018.
    Rauh S; Johnson BS; Bowers A; Tritz D; Vassar BM
    BMC Urol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):102. PubMed ID: 35820886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Decision analysis and Markov modeling in urology.
    Hsieh MH; Meng MV
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1867-74. PubMed ID: 17868735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects.
    Franklin JM; Rassen JA; Ackermann D; Bartels DB; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(10):1685-99. PubMed ID: 24323618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Propensity scores: Methods, considerations, and applications in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
    McMurry TL; Hu Y; Blackstone EH; Kozower BD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jul; 150(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 25963441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Head to head comparison of the propensity score and the high-dimensional propensity score matching methods.
    Guertin JR; Rahme E; Dormuth CR; LeLorier J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():22. PubMed ID: 26891796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measuring balance and model selection in propensity score methods.
    Belitser SV; Martens EP; Pestman WR; Groenwold RH; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1115-29. PubMed ID: 21805529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Balance measures for propensity score methods: a clinical example on beta-agonist use and the risk of myocardial infarction.
    Groenwold RH; de Vries F; de Boer A; Pestman WR; Rutten FH; Hoes AW; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1130-7. PubMed ID: 21953948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How Do Propensity Score Methods Measure Up in the Presence of Measurement Error? A Monte Carlo Study.
    Rodríguez De Gil P; Bellara AP; Lanehart RE; Lee RS; Kim ES; Kromrey JD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):520-32. PubMed ID: 26610250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inadequate statistical power of negative clinical trials in urological literature.
    Breau RH; Carnat TA; Gaboury I
    J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):263-6. PubMed ID: 16753417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.