110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28608613)
1. Remote control improves quality of life in elderly pacemaker patients versus standard ambulatory-based follow-up.
Comoretto RI; Facchin D; Ghidina M; Proclemer A; Gregori D
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):681-689. PubMed ID: 28608613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long term quality-of-life in patients with bradycardia pacemaker implantation.
Udo EO; van Hemel NM; Zuithoff NP; Nijboer H; Taks W; Doevendans PA; Moons KG
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(3):2159-63. PubMed ID: 23453871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Telemonitoring and Quality of Life in Patients after 12 Months Following a Pacemaker Implant: the Nordland Study, a Randomised Trial.
López-Liria R; López-Villegas A; Enebakk T; Thunhaug H; Lappegård KT; Catalán-Matamoros D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 31195650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of improved quality of life 1 year after pacemaker implantation.
van Eck JW; van Hemel NM; van den Bos A; Taks W; Grobbee DE; Moons KG
Am Heart J; 2008 Sep; 156(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 18760131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness and Safety in Remote Monitoring of Patients with Pacemakers Five Years after an Implant: The Poniente Study.
López-Liria R; López-Villegas A; Leal-Costa C; Peiró S; Robles-Musso E; Bautista-Mesa R; Rocamora-Pérez P; Lappegård KT; Catalán-Matamoros D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32102208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers.
Crossley GH; Chen J; Choucair W; Cohen TJ; Gohn DC; Johnson WB; Kennedy EE; Mongeon LR; Serwer GA; Qiao H; Wilkoff BL;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):2012-9. PubMed ID: 19926006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health-related quality of life on tele-monitoring for users with pacemakers 6 months after implant: the NORDLAND study, a randomized trial.
Lopez-Villegas A; Catalan-Matamoros D; Lopez-Liria R; Enebakk T; Thunhaug H; Lappegård KT
BMC Geriatr; 2018 Sep; 18(1):223. PubMed ID: 30241511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative Effectiveness of Remote Monitoring of People with Cardiac Pacemaker versus Conventional: quality of Life at the 6 Months].
López-Villegas A; Catalán-Matamoros D; Robles-Musso E; Peiró S
Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2015 Apr; 89(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 26121625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of pacemaker tele-monitoring on quality of life, functional capacity, event detection and workload: The PONIENTE trial.
Lopez-Villegas A; Catalan-Matamoros D; Robles-Musso E; Peiro S
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 26635263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-hospital follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker carriers: patients' inconvenience and points of view. A four-hospital Italian survey.
Gramegna L; Tomasi C; Gasparini G; Scaboro G; Zanon F; Boaretto G; Tomei R; Tomasi L
Europace; 2012 Mar; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22080472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence and predictors of pacemaker reprogramming: potential consequences for remote follow-up.
Udo EO; van Hemel NM; Zuithoff NP; Barrett MJ; Ruiter JH; Doevendans PA; Moons KG
Europace; 2013 Jul; 15(7):978-83. PubMed ID: 23419656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Findings of an observational investigation of pure remote follow-up of pacemaker patients: is the in-clinic device check still needed?
Facchin D; Baccillieri MS; Gasparini G; Zoppo F; Allocca G; Brieda M; Verlato R; Proclemer A
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 220():781-6. PubMed ID: 27394974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sustained 3-Year Benefits in Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Elderly: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Yan BP; Chan LLY; Lee VWY; Yu CM; Wong MCS; Sanderson J; Reid CM
Value Health; 2018 Apr; 21(4):423-431. PubMed ID: 29680099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Success of pacemaker remote monitoring using app-based technology: Does patient age matter?
Tarakji KG; Vives CA; Patel AS; Fagan DH; Sims JJ; Varma N
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 Oct; 41(10):1329-1335. PubMed ID: 30055013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine follow-up after pacemaker implantation: frequency, pacemaker programming and professionals in charge.
van Eck JW; van Hemel NM; de Voogt WG; Meeder JG; Spierenburg HA; Crommentuyn H; Keijzer R; Grobbee DE; Moons KG;
Europace; 2008 Jul; 10(7):832-7. PubMed ID: 18420650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Portuguese version, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of specific quality-of-life questionnaire -AQUAREL - for pacemaker patients].
Oliveira BG; Melendez JG; Ciconelli RM; Rincón LG; Torres AA; de Sousa LA; Ribeiro AL
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2006 Aug; 87(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 16951823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of leadless pacemaker and conventional pacemaker for quality of life improvement in patients with bradyarrhythmias].
Yu M; Li YP; Zhou YJ; Shi DM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Mar; 103(10):733-739. PubMed ID: 36889686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pacemaker remote monitoring in the pediatric population: is it a real solution?
Leoni L; Padalino M; Biffanti R; Ferretto S; Vettor G; Corrado D; Stellin G; Milanesi O; Iliceto S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 38(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 25645302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in quality-of-life after pacemaker implantation: responsiveness of the Aquarel questionnaire.
Stofmeel MA; Post MW; Kelder JC; Grobbee DE; van Hemel NM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 11310296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The contribution of rate adaptive pacing with single or dual sensors to health-related quality of life.
van Hemel NM; Holwerda KJ; Slegers PC; Spierenburg HA; Timmermans AA; Meeder JG; van der Kemp P; Kelder JC; Stofmeel MA;
Europace; 2007 Apr; 9(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 17350981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
