These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2860867)
1. [Quality criteria and quality control in mammography]. Friedrich M Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():63-75. PubMed ID: 2860867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quality control of x-ray pictures--results of the Bavarian field study]. Bunde E; Schätzl M; Lissner J; Ribka A Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():163-75. PubMed ID: 2860859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality control in mammography. Everyone has a role. American College of Radiology. Haus A Adm Radiol; 1992 Nov; 11(11):123, 125-6, 129-30. PubMed ID: 10123210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance. Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography. Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality control in mammography. 1. Status check]. Hautmann J; Säbel M Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jan; 41(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3344445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary]. Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results. Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quality assurance of mammographic devices]. Nowotny R; Semturs F Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(21-23):556-9. PubMed ID: 11762254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Wisconsin mammography quality assurance program. Bunge M; Zvara JA; Remington PL Wis Med J; 1990 Sep; 89(9):527-8. PubMed ID: 2238690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comments on the standards for acceptance and consistency testing of systems for digital radiography]. Schätzl M; Braunschweig R; Hoppe T; Lenzen H; Schenk H; Schramm H; Streng W; von Volkmann T; Kamm KF Rofo; 2005 Sep; 177(9):1297-304. PubMed ID: 16123878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quality control in mammography]. Stöffler G Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():48-53. PubMed ID: 3705126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [As always, human quality takes precedence over equipment quality. Reflections on quality assurance of screening mammography and the ineluctable evolution towards digital systems]. Stines J J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 12736584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 1998 Mammography Quality Standards Act final rule: summary of new requirements. Hosp Technol Ser; 1997 Dec; 16(16):17-8. PubMed ID: 10187283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assurance in mammography: the Michigan breast phantom test experience. Rebner M; Windham JP Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):73A-75A; discussion 76A-78A. PubMed ID: 8421773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent]. Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]