These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28609114)
1. Do Incidental Hyperechoic Renal Lesions Measuring Up to 1 cm Warrant Further Imaging? Outcomes of 161 Lesions. Doshi AM; Ayoola A; Rosenkrantz AB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):346-350. PubMed ID: 28609114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT imaging of solid renal masses: pitfalls and solutions. Krishna S; Murray CA; McInnes MD; Chatelain R; Siddaiah M; Al-Dandan O; Narayanasamy S; Schieda N Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):708-721. PubMed ID: 28592361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging characterize CT-indeterminate renal masses? A prospective evaluation with histological confirmation. Thaiss WM; Bedke J; Kruck S; Spira D; Stenzl A; Nikolaou K; Horger M; Kaufmann S World J Urol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 30324296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT. Takahashi N; Leng S; Kitajima K; Gomez-Cardona D; Thapa P; Carter RE; Leibovich BC; Sasiwimonphan K; Sasaguri K; Kawashima A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1194-202. PubMed ID: 26587925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Jinzaki M; Tanimoto A; Narimatsu Y; Ohkuma K; Kurata T; Shinmoto H; Hiramatsu K; Mukai M; Murai M Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 9356635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma. Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma. Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT. Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tuberose sclerosis complex: analysis of growth rates aids differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from atypical or minimal-fat-containing angiomyolipoma. Patel U; Simpson E; Kingswood JC; Saggar-Malik AK Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):665-73; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 16038693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography. Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Findings of Fat-Poor Angiomyolipomas. Potretzke AM; Potretzke TA; Bauman TM; Knight BA; Park AM; Mobley JM; Figenshau RS; Siegel CL J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):119-128. PubMed ID: 27897036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma? Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency of Angiomyolipomas Among Echogenic Nonshadowing Renal Masses (> 4 mm) Found at Ultrasound and the Utility of MRI for Diagnosis. de Silva S; Copping R; Malouf D; Hutton A; Maclean F; Aslan P AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 28834450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angiomyolipomas that do not contain fat attenuation at unenhanced CT. Jinzaki M; Silverman SG; Tanimoto A; Shinmoto H; Kuribayashi S Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):311; author reply 311-2. PubMed ID: 15618388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contemporary update on imaging of cystic renal masses with histopathological correlation and emphasis on patient management. Narayanasamy S; Krishna S; Prasad Shanbhogue AK; Flood TA; Sadoughi N; Sathiadoss P; Schieda N Clin Radiol; 2019 Feb; 74(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 30314810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphologic analysis with computed tomography may help differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study with 602 patients. Kim YH; Han K; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Park SY Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):647-654. PubMed ID: 28677004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Renal cell carcinoma: attenuation values on unenhanced CT. Pooler BD; Pickhardt PJ; O'Connor SD; Bruce RJ; Patel SR; Nakada SY AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 22528901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the classification of CT-indeterminate renal lesions. Edenberg J; Gløersen K; Osman HA; Dimmen M; Berg GV Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):445-451. PubMed ID: 27609413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can subcentimetre ultrasound detected angiomyolipomas be safely disregarded? Hussain T; Lam V; Farhad M; Lee S; Stephenson JA; Kockelbergh R; Rajesh A Clin Radiol; 2020 Apr; 75(4):287-292. PubMed ID: 31916983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]