411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28609114)
1. Do Incidental Hyperechoic Renal Lesions Measuring Up to 1 cm Warrant Further Imaging? Outcomes of 161 Lesions.
Doshi AM; Ayoola A; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):346-350. PubMed ID: 28609114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT imaging of solid renal masses: pitfalls and solutions.
Krishna S; Murray CA; McInnes MD; Chatelain R; Siddaiah M; Al-Dandan O; Narayanasamy S; Schieda N
Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):708-721. PubMed ID: 28592361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging characterize CT-indeterminate renal masses? A prospective evaluation with histological confirmation.
Thaiss WM; Bedke J; Kruck S; Spira D; Stenzl A; Nikolaou K; Horger M; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 30324296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Leng S; Kitajima K; Gomez-Cardona D; Thapa P; Carter RE; Leibovich BC; Sasiwimonphan K; Sasaguri K; Kawashima A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1194-202. PubMed ID: 26587925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat.
Jinzaki M; Tanimoto A; Narimatsu Y; Ohkuma K; Kurata T; Shinmoto H; Hiramatsu K; Mukai M; Murai M
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 9356635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tuberose sclerosis complex: analysis of growth rates aids differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from atypical or minimal-fat-containing angiomyolipoma.
Patel U; Simpson E; Kingswood JC; Saggar-Malik AK
Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):665-73; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 16038693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Findings of Fat-Poor Angiomyolipomas.
Potretzke AM; Potretzke TA; Bauman TM; Knight BA; Park AM; Mobley JM; Figenshau RS; Siegel CL
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):119-128. PubMed ID: 27897036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency of Angiomyolipomas Among Echogenic Nonshadowing Renal Masses (> 4 mm) Found at Ultrasound and the Utility of MRI for Diagnosis.
de Silva S; Copping R; Malouf D; Hutton A; Maclean F; Aslan P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 28834450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angiomyolipomas that do not contain fat attenuation at unenhanced CT.
Jinzaki M; Silverman SG; Tanimoto A; Shinmoto H; Kuribayashi S
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):311; author reply 311-2. PubMed ID: 15618388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contemporary update on imaging of cystic renal masses with histopathological correlation and emphasis on patient management.
Narayanasamy S; Krishna S; Prasad Shanbhogue AK; Flood TA; Sadoughi N; Sathiadoss P; Schieda N
Clin Radiol; 2019 Feb; 74(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 30314810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphologic analysis with computed tomography may help differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study with 602 patients.
Kim YH; Han K; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Park SY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):647-654. PubMed ID: 28677004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Renal cell carcinoma: attenuation values on unenhanced CT.
Pooler BD; Pickhardt PJ; O'Connor SD; Bruce RJ; Patel SR; Nakada SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 22528901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the classification of CT-indeterminate renal lesions.
Edenberg J; Gløersen K; Osman HA; Dimmen M; Berg GV
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):445-451. PubMed ID: 27609413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can subcentimetre ultrasound detected angiomyolipomas be safely disregarded?
Hussain T; Lam V; Farhad M; Lee S; Stephenson JA; Kockelbergh R; Rajesh A
Clin Radiol; 2020 Apr; 75(4):287-292. PubMed ID: 31916983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
